RE: Bug in IOTP's DTD
"Smith, Chris " <CHRIS.SMITH@royalbank.com> Fri, 15 October 1999 15:14 UTC
Received: from one.eListX.com (one.elistx.com [209.116.252.130]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id LAA14181 for <trade-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 1999 11:14:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from one.elistx.com by one.eListX.com id aa04422; 15 Oct 99 10:51 EDT
Received: from rbmail.royalbank.com by one.eListX.com id aa04410; 15 Oct 99 10:50 EDT
Received: id KAA12932; Fri, 15 Oct 1999 10:28:08 -0400
Received: by gateway ???
X-Server-Uuid: d237928a-6c98-11d3-985c-00a0c9ea509d
Received: by gateway id <48DV7KGC>; Fri, 15 Oct 1999 10:31:55 -0400
Message-ID: <2B30A9965635D311A29F002035297FFB1B2A1B@se001010.rbc1.royalbank.com>
From: "Smith, Chris " <CHRIS.SMITH@royalbank.com>
To: 'David Burdett' <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, "'hiroya@sdl.hitachi.co.jp'" <hiroya@sdl.hitachi.co.jp>
cc: "IETF Trade (E-mail)" <ietf-trade@lists.eListX.com>, "'kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp'" <kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp>, "'kent@differential.com'" <kent@differential.com>
Subject: RE: Bug in IOTP's DTD
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 10:32:05 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
X-WSS-ID: 1419E563236961-01-01
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01BF171A.071BC634"
Sender: ietf-trade-owner@lists.eListX.com
Precedence: bulk
X-elistx: ietf-trade
Source-Info: From (or Sender) name not authenticated.
Interesting. The following is a rather subtle point, easily missed when viewing the DTD (and NOT actually an error), but... IOTP PackagedContent has <!ELEMENT PackagedContent (#PCDATA) > <!ATTLIST PackagedContent Name CDATA #IMPLIED Content NMTOKEN "PCDATA" Transform (NONE|BASE64) "NONE" > while IOTP,DSIG has (corrected with removing the #IMPLIED) <!ELEMENT Value (#PCDATA) > <!ATTLIST Value ID ID #IMPLIED encoding (base64|none) 'base64' > Is there a specific reason that the attributes "encoding" and "Transform" don't agree on parameter content and the default value of the parameter, even though they are almost exactly the same thing? Also, I can live with 'encoding' but this is risking confusion with 'encoding' as it refers to character sets like ISO-8859-1 (and as used on the <?xml ...> XML declaration). I realize that IOTP and DSIG are being worked on independently, but could we have them be a little less independent? ------------------------------------------------------------ Chris Smith +1.416.348.6090 Royal Bank chris.smith@royalbank.com > -----Original Message----- > From: David Burdett [mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com] > Sent: October 14, 1999 08:55 PM > To: 'hiroya@sdl.hitachi.co.jp' > Cc: IETF Trade (E-mail); 'kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp'; > 'kent@differential.com' > Subject: RE: Bug in IOTP's DTD > > > Masaaki > > I accept that there is a mistake in the IOTP DTD, however > this part of the IOTP DTD was copied **directly** from the > the IOTP dsig spec at > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0 > -dsig-03.txt > > which contains the same error. The only changes made when > copying were the removal of some blank lines and page headers > and footers. > > The reason for copying in the IOTP dsig DTD is to avoid > having to use namespaces in IOTP. > > So really what I think we should do is: > 1. Fix the DTD in the IOTP dsig spec (Yoshiaki ?) and then > 2. Fix the DTD in the IOTP spec. > > Regards > > David > > -----Original Message----- > From: Masaaki Hiroya [mailto:hiroya@sdl.hitachi.co.jp] > Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 3:33 AM > To: David Burdett > Cc: hiroya@sdl.hitachi.co.jp > Subject: Bug in IOTP's DTD > > > > David > > There is a bug in ietf.org/draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-protocol-06. > > > <!ELEMENT Value ( #PCDATA ) > > > <!ATTLIST Value > > ID ID #IMPLIED > > encoding (base64|none) #IMPLIED 'base64' > > > I think #IMPLIED in the "encoding" attribute should be removed. > > Draft-ietf-trade-iotp-v1.0-dsig-03.txt defines the Value > element as follows: > > > <!ELEMENT Value ( #PCDATA ) > > > <!ATTLIST Value > > ID ID #IMPLIED > > encoding (base64|none) 'base64' > > Please correct the DTD in iotp-v1.0-protocol-06. > > Masaaki > > ----- > Masaaki Hiroya > Systems Development Laboratory > Hitachi, Ltd. > tel: +81-44-549-1531 > fax: +81-44-549-1640 > email: hiroya@sdl.hitachi.co.jp >
- RE: Bug in IOTP's DTD David Burdett
- RE: Bug in IOTP's DTD Smith, Chris
- RE: Bug in IOTP's DTD Yoshiaki KAWATSURA
- RE: Bug in IOTP's DTD David Burdett