[tram] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-tram-stun-origin-05: (with COMMENT)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 14 May 2015 14:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F891B2B2B; Thu, 14 May 2015 07:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OBmrvqNx_QkG; Thu, 14 May 2015 07:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB641ACCEB; Thu, 14 May 2015 07:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150514143819.16865.95337.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 07:38:19 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/AfPkkoxlmPrw_RdTjBlttg2z9xU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 19 May 2015 09:22:24 -0700
Cc: tram-chairs@ietf.org, tram@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tram-stun-origin.shepherd@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tram-stun-origin.ad@ietf.org, sperreault@jive.com, draft-ietf-tram-stun-origin@ietf.org
Subject: [tram] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-tram-stun-origin-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 14:38:20 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tram-stun-origin-05: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tram-stun-origin/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Edit: My comments have been addressed in discussion, with the expectation of some very minor edits. I agree with all 3 points of Barry's discuss. I think the normative language in section 2.1 is ambiguous about whether it applies to all stun implementations used by a browser, SIP, or XMPP, or just those that "implement this draft". A thoughtful reader can infer the answer from the fact that the draft does not update STUN, but it might be helpful to clarify. [Removed some comments that have been explained to my satisfaction] Nits: -- Section 1: I agree with Barry that the first reference to STUN should probably go in the previous sentence. Should reference to " Section 4.5 of [RFC7376]" really be 4.6"? 4.5 talks about a MiTM learning USERNAME. 4.6 talks about hosting multiple realms from the same IP address. (And as Barry mentioned, these are really "List entries 5 or 6 in Section 4")
- [tram] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
- [tram] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell