[tram] Comments on draft-ietf-tram-auth-problems

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Tue, 01 July 2014 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A1B1A019C for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 05:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id trUlGocoigoS for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 05:17:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDDC21A019B for <tram@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 05:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79da6d000004ad3-a7-53b2a6cecd4f
Received: from ESESSHC012.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 93.18.19155.EC6A2B35; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 14:17:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [147.214.22.62] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 14:17:18 +0200
Message-ID: <53B2A6CE.3000909@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:17:18 +0200
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tram@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpmluLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGfG3Rvfcsk3BBkubzC0+rL3A5sDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujKd/vrAWbGWt6Nl9ga2BcStLFyMnh4SAicT507eYIWwxiQv3 1rN1MXJxCAkcZZTY2NrLAuGsYpQ48egzO0gVr4C2xN33D8E6WARUJB5POcAEYrMJWEhsuXUf bKqoQJTEnUv9rBD1ghInZz4Bi4sICEvMPXgXzBYWMJI4OvMCYxcjB9BmcYmexiCQMLOAnsSU qy2MELa8xPa3c8BWCQGtXf6shWUCI/8sJFNnIWmZhaRlASPzKkbR4tTipNx0I2O91KLM5OLi /Dy9vNSSTYzAUDu45bfqDsbLbxwPMQpwMCrx8C5YujFYiDWxrLgy9xCjNAeLkjjvwnPzgoUE 0hNLUrNTUwtSi+KLSnNSiw8xMnFwSjUw8l53VlLV5X1/dqF31cWpMbcyEsyfbF6/YtXEq4uT 1bc6rO+2SfQvd/4rFd23pOFFXEVsk8jueRWCCldyXPf/dTrHe79aU9S7JVd1XvEXoXvaPfnR s9/X9QRHb7gTZ7Gq9mZveabHP5EVhzJ1Ig/dKWOJm/lV8UvHb6VAjtmxpxpi/JrVui4rsRRn JBpqMRcVJwIAl5c8GBYCAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/I297a1y96s_9R8l-a7gezAd63X8
Subject: [tram] Comments on draft-ietf-tram-auth-problems
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:17:24 -0000

Hi,

a few comments on the draft below before we request its publication:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tram-auth-problems/

Given that we are not actively working on
draft-thomson-tram-turn-bandwidth, it should not be used as a
justification for this work. Therefore, it should be removed from the
references.

The heading of the draft says it belongs to the BEHAVE WG. Please,
replace BEHAVE with TRAM.

Section 1 (Introduction) talks about P2P applications. Does that refer
to P2P applications in the RFC 5694 sense? Or just to any application
that involves end systems exchanging traffic without a server in
between? Please clarify.

Thanks,

Gonzalo