IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tram] Comments on draft-ietf-tram-auth-problems

"Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com> Thu, 03 July 2014 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368171B29DC for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 06:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t95u7Wn5vKfm for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 06:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 195831B29D8 for <tram@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 06:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1734; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1404395205; x=1405604805; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=aLBOmqtsgCjTK4hlrcWEuS5YA9xBnszCUZy+vOX1rCs=; b=J6W1F5ycz+o2zafy6E5QPFDPyDgNnaYWZMwxOGQmVSqUNL5eIymC9zKo Zw+e9toLyxT3A/k1yLn0F3SthODVqZIxGNe9hQ7TqWhKgEBzZVsmxUoqG XVaMc3KUwpJfg5kamXZ2cGZPaspHE73O7okedE7OVEqccYhRfVd2LBScX o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvEGADNetVOtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABagw1SWqs8AQIBAQEFAQJsAZIlh0EBgQUWdYQDAQEBAwEBAQE3NBcGAQgRBAEBCxQJLgsUCQkBBAESCIgyCA3JBReFcIkBPoMngRYFjheOHoZIi3qDQ4Iw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,595,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="337507565"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Jul 2014 13:46:44 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s63Dki4G025868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 3 Jul 2014 13:46:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.102]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 08:46:44 -0500
From: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tram] Comments on draft-ietf-tram-auth-problems
Thread-Index: Ac+WxThWlSTo8A+kQVqlQeHYAxyHlA==
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 13:46:43 +0000
Message-ID: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A282EB6F9@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.61.38]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/S3pxoFhvvFrNNJaHtHC4_cboJRg
Subject: Re: [tram] Comments on draft-ietf-tram-auth-problems
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 13:46:50 -0000

Hi Gonzalo,

Thanks for the review. Please see inline 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tram [mailto:tram-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo
> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2014 5:47 PM
> To: tram@ietf.org
> Subject: [tram] Comments on draft-ietf-tram-auth-problems
> 
> Hi,
> 
> a few comments on the draft below before we request its publication:
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tram-auth-problems/
> 
> Given that we are not actively working on draft-thomson-tram-turn-bandwidth,
> it should not be used as a justification for this work. Therefore, it should be
> removed from the references.

Agreed, removed.

> 
> The heading of the draft says it belongs to the BEHAVE WG. Please, replace
> BEHAVE with TRAM.

Fixed.

> 
> Section 1 (Introduction) talks about P2P applications. Does that refer to P2P
> applications in the RFC 5694 sense? 
> Or just to any application that involves end
> systems exchanging traffic without a server in between? Please clarify.

It could be any P2P application and not restricted to the definition in RFC 5694. From the definition of RFC 5694 looks like WebRTC, SIP applications are not categorized as P2P, but applications using peer to peer streaming protocol (PPSP) will be categorized as P2P. TURN server could be used with all these type of applications. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5128#section-2.7 defines P2P application similar to your latter explanation, will add reference to this RFC.

-Tiru

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> tram@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email