Re: [tram] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-johnston-tram-stun-origin-03.txt
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 30 June 2014 20:23 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F141A04A3 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B6awxcKAvHwp for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (mail-we0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D21361A02FB for <tram@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id x48so8715866wes.11 for <tram@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZeY4BitteYKlGeqFpRKz9d9Bb5GoXx/0PWea3FfYhEg=; b=0+ojZ7/JYxFKYMNqwwhK1mId/ZcBKLs1rkMwCJXv7SSmYgyQzWpER8c6ip/PPtKy4R uIB7G/eCt2dne4l6++8OSxJhQYmuywMmbUSyH3+Wt9uk6SSJLVb7JUK8POn1+0VQk6Wq /JyRgdTFsKRxBDBPgVk8YhgpoksPuHyx4WZ92jsQ+PfXcAVUR7JL17u8Xcm+2P0HAEgJ yO2sx8iGaQikgrH+ZgenkIpqAnTBwWFllrcaDBIVLdmHHOp4+sazR/X6bDPXaXvFx7c4 W8fkcSvQgS4RyspSwQff55ZSmUEi3ewUt9s2POcRuaE3FQHSbkK39/DxN11kqu1CsuD7 +KQQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.81.37 with SMTP id w5mr31468563wix.65.1404159805419; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.165.6 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKhHsXHRj0aMFoZcUpkV2T+-Z9=VdK4LgdchTYvE6_99k2oSxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140628165007.32702.46107.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKhHsXGc_SGo1MSNXJvNL8wt51G8Hs4yOyVt6vh83RKiHpoO1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnV_fGAQQRk3-=VZGxbtT7jwwG2so0j+pYxZHVyJxH+EUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKhHsXHRj0aMFoZcUpkV2T+-Z9=VdK4LgdchTYvE6_99k2oSxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:23:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUKq39vTY5sYMUogoCkK7dYCR7kvXui-3-5inY-o+XGiw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/KzH2WR4vLjehC4h8wKaOgprU_BA
Cc: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tram] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-johnston-tram-stun-origin-03.txt
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:23:30 -0000
On 30 June 2014 11:45, Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > I agree we don't want to limit it to 5-character-or-less URI schemes. The > reason this text is there is because of concerns that this attribute will > make STUN messages too big. How much extra space should we allow. Up to 280 > octets? Or should we just point out that origin strings from RFC6454 are > likely to be around 253 octets long, and using strings that are > significantly longer is NOT RECOMMENDED. That's probably best. I don't think that people intentionally create long names, but sometimes you have no choice. IDN names do get pretty large.
- [tram] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-jo… Alan Johnston
- Re: [tram] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Martin Thomson
- Re: [tram] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [tram] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Alan Johnston
- Re: [tram] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Alan Johnston
- Re: [tram] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Martin Thomson