Re: [tram] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-johnston-tram-stun-origin-02.txt

As we say in the draft, if it is adopted as a WG item, we will do whatever
the chairs think is best.  I suspect we could finish the draft in the same
amount of time as an RFC 4020 action.

I would also point out that we did use a TBD value in the first version of
the draft to make sure that that was interest.  We put in the value in the
next revision after we had interest in having running code.

- Alan -

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca
> wrote:

> Le 2014-04-04 17:20, Brandon Williams a écrit :
> > Has attribute number 0x802F been assigned? I don't see it in the
> > official registry. If not, then I suggest you follow the common practice
> > of using a placeholder (e.g. TBD) in place of the option number
> > throughout the document with a note to the editor about the
> > search-and-replace operation to be done before publishing. I know
> > there's a related editor's note in the document, but the referenced
> > rfc4020 specifically indicates that you should not include an
> > unallocated value in an I.D.
>
> +1
>
> This is more important than it may seem.
>
> Simon
> --
> DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
> NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
> STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
>
> _______________________________________________
> tram mailing list
> tram@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram
>