Re: [Trans] Design of gossip
Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Tue, 30 September 2014 15:57 UTC
Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF9F1A1A8E for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.165
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.165 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AWkPzrP9s9oX for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x235.google.com (mail-qa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B90E1A1A84 for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id v10so1398098qac.26 for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=zLgq6PG4HyHw8cV0XrCWIX8hamBCkO36Rgef1J5wEO8=; b=hVbAR+GqYh7meMUozS/yt5bJeElyIdWrb3DbSpRFnWSEInZ7PSzn4ovPb3c62mpP3d lfUAA6ZKwtdi210bYeh0ONqHpheUHpaogZ/yXFxEXyrGo1S0eJJyS+o+GZmXeF8owJC4 LxEtpApiqkiTZGqm0gsKoVczz1NWNbEX80GrZEhJduXp5pgExL/04ZcG5wd0Kf9LK5ux wgt9YScZoeg/xVwbB4ErT1ZgrSZLSHaS3Rr0yuvHYpQH6b0nkk5lZN6EBlCvR+xC5IjY nw6lKM7YZiNod9H+SOzksBT8Ztptq+pvEk1TGy1Z+RoqoPWSfUjvftvGaap4sqM/83pT er0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zLgq6PG4HyHw8cV0XrCWIX8hamBCkO36Rgef1J5wEO8=; b=iwxel2og6uv6toyauC1U3/+ju+hqO7LuzBTd3ymKrk1EQbxl+oHZ09gHZtc9CXNl9B ekc1+q4yccg6mqDT03MVJ+fSyBTX4tcsI2MXCOVWut7dEQ+HMODNpub1pJnGjfIanAaf nkVWHdwI0DG8q/0dBK+uHQBLQy06UgQJWz1poGU73qDZmleeq9L1K+av09xOmyWGgG9+ nqca+evd7+pkso7sfyPRzLtz7G728QeFiO9yeBBAU54crG8UVIst+TjNUWcDaQZ8yIRE jo0B1TXGmje+I53NKCVPnrTVhVPUB91FPX/veFQoD1MaUoUPZoA53b1wohkc2oY/cifi 3lbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkR0gnurFNeygVKH4fvt4+zJxMGZWxBOpSjGimmtNWR1Q2cv7VWZjeqgWXTzxIkQGbEnPzA
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.51.197 with SMTP id e5mr61703596qag.48.1412092635475; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.247.198 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0c=NDRnVUE0APeoYq2AL4hsX6nOQXnzGaJcP2vrNYJBduw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACsn0c=NDRnVUE0APeoYq2AL4hsX6nOQXnzGaJcP2vrNYJBduw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:57:15 +0100
Message-ID: <CABrd9SRvSqSdKGqYSnqdTGeyoSfpigAN3iwFDPciQgAgPvQW=A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/25cJ7r90qc_vniQsZs3GTYq6vhw
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Design of gossip
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:57:17 -0000
On 27 September 2014 18:42, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote: > The first choice is what to gossip: tree heads and proofs or certs. > Both have privacy implications: while certs more directly reveal which > sites are visited, it's possible that tree heads will be unique per > cert due to the impact of adding to a tree one cert at a time, so each > precert will end up showing a different head. This is a tricky issue. Precerts (and certs) are not linked to any particular head.
- [Trans] Design of gossip Watson Ladd
- Re: [Trans] Design of gossip Linus Nordberg
- Re: [Trans] Design of gossip Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Design of gossip Ben Laurie