Re: [Trans] Design of gossip
Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Tue, 30 September 2014 15:57 UTC
Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807EF1A1A84 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.165
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.165 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VaiYgJWMJWcx for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22d.google.com (mail-qg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 452F01A1A7B for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id e89so1988512qgf.4 for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=taEVDGa86Grys6KGr1cUGMI+H60asPi56HynGypqAYM=; b=YnTohCtONaOcNVAqdWZwcDRwNsFn1Nq0CXLWgeXw9cZB+QoyPrqCHtE/zF96SoBZbV JJY71WPW39zamrD7aG9w/ba2txfcEDfelkWgmzfhz3llrYPTay2t86DXdh4IqVimun6b PL42h8U/CX478YaQJVWrX0jRkZXhVPpDJzlRR8fy98/dN0M2jyHBZhwImi/VJzAs9310 GIZWoFi+4LaUKFvsb11KALUgZP74623BadbMek4DH0GyZtmUw2aFUCX0kNgMQcbdn0dl LJBcUQZymAnWL8jkSkNHshrJUsLVJezdpswfrc9e110kQRl+kPI3cT2ocUqyaQ9j/ydv DMWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=taEVDGa86Grys6KGr1cUGMI+H60asPi56HynGypqAYM=; b=If/BUbGx7CExlOITyf+A3ueMeGCo9x/jqYBTSrEG23BHE8JbTw+3jixfY8mwYVnAVe xZtQiSAIj3Ellbfq4M7z41DVFhW8JhVt/hiqzGS9oylVx7tm3tm9UqwBZ1wSsjXb1QuP VsK+YTZrxhRDfPXVelxj1+r543+gKweaXa3WQKIXFiyWbs/s1Q7IPV9LNBkCzFoTfNvv T3zccZQKoqc8slrJbrxjmVO65l9OUPXE0+Sp/xFNPlbDITzjciw4ZP7uGkqMBj0AOyrS Jfv6urVw0GzGdWm3Scxgk9Z3bVxL2yXlDV/24yCMXpleha1nR+NFUtI3RL4ZTQD35j58 gY0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkCq62Ovqi3Qln8NAXIW9v/kpFdLNrRsyWbo/oVn0fgXbrLQM5Y4N75jPEciDQFpubFke3H
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.69.195 with SMTP id a3mr63892664qaj.59.1412092670585; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.247.198 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8738bapmxj.fsf@nordberg.se>
References: <CACsn0c=NDRnVUE0APeoYq2AL4hsX6nOQXnzGaJcP2vrNYJBduw@mail.gmail.com> <8738bapmxj.fsf@nordberg.se>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:57:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CABrd9ST8iR6d2gKrte92sQz5RPkvO9iphdO8YddojJK=PXErQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Linus Nordberg <linus@nordu.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/pkl7niMccu09iufZpvuE3qqyMhA
Cc: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Design of gossip
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:57:55 -0000
On 29 September 2014 14:37, Linus Nordberg <linus@nordu.net> wrote: > | The first choice is what to gossip: tree heads and proofs or certs. > > What's the reason for including proofs in the gossiping? Is it an > optimisation of network resources? My initial thought has been that > gossiping about anything that's not signed by logs opens up for attacks > against log reputation. Proofs are signed by logs, though (if you include the entity they are proving).
- [Trans] Design of gossip Watson Ladd
- Re: [Trans] Design of gossip Linus Nordberg
- Re: [Trans] Design of gossip Ben Laurie
- Re: [Trans] Design of gossip Ben Laurie