Re: [Trans] Comments on RFC6962

Jon Callas <jon@callas.org> Tue, 01 April 2014 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jon@callas.org>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BF71A06CE for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 05:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4O88ZHH_oCyr for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 05:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.merrymeet.com (merrymeet.com [173.164.244.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D951A06BE for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 05:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.merrymeet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF83507F09A; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 05:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merrymeet.com
Received: from mail.merrymeet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (merrymeet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2t8c+J4Jrgqy; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 05:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from keys.merrymeet.com (keys.merrymeet.com [173.164.244.97]) by mail.merrymeet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36005507F08C; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 05:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.12.52.21] ([83.97.14.218]) by keys.merrymeet.com (PGP Universal service); Tue, 01 Apr 2014 05:58:13 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by keys.merrymeet.com on Tue, 01 Apr 2014 05:58:13 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Jon Callas <jon@callas.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwi5wUijNyLH+fGBTS4w3c57juCwRO+kh5mKK9sebR=txw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 05:58:07 -0700
Message-Id: <498EFA2E-3BC9-4A49-950A-57900932AC34@callas.org>
References: <CAMm+LwiYZi=+dPFecO7GHQc5=-d=tWenkQ-igMJtfpq0PenN9w@mail.gmail.com> <r422Ps-1075i-0BB240A7A2644D5AA820331F73FD3375@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local> <CAMm+Lwi5wUijNyLH+fGBTS4w3c57juCwRO+kh5mKK9sebR=txw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/7sTR30c5Lip250XTG43wjQS4VTw
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Comments on RFC6962
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 12:58:27 -0000

On Mar 10, 2014, at 5:18 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:

> Adding tags in JSON is straightforward and existing applications SHOULD simply ignore them. But we should probably make some sort of explicit statement.

The above sounds pretty explicit to me. Who has the pen on the relevant documents?

	Jon