IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-36: (with DISCUSS)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 14 May 2021 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0071A3A3C41 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8QZs4jzVdBm6 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C2813A0A0B for <trans@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FhcpP09YDzCfb; Fri, 14 May 2021 20:42:37 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1621017757; bh=9mp8Bo/f3O/5ZXfeGxIahcQVt5BSAp1AXgiu5VrO7fQ=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=XcdtAGgMbYyyzFkF/Scul696M8ergI8H9Cf/Pk3c+yZ7lueS7bLRG0pBQwiwLYrnJ 3J6tsn4yP0kX44fVRS6pa0zHPEeJNd5Yu8fD/SBxHpIbphsvbLrSp6NAEWTfKi31mB H/HbASdZf/pmTLTJLRo3+JoBsusX6aFSvjjaa/Tk=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20VZ4hks0Htu; Fri, 14 May 2021 20:42:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 14 May 2021 20:42:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBDD25947F; Fri, 14 May 2021 14:42:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A7A5947E; Fri, 14 May 2021 14:42:33 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 14:42:33 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Rob Stradling <rob@sectigo.com>
cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <MW4PR17MB4729344A64625F16A3A832ABAA509@MW4PR17MB4729.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <a0f82cf3-5571-4b9d-bd52-1d384bb1a68@nohats.ca>
References: <162092843952.1774.17184633862596345877@ietfa.amsl.com> <18343E4C-99E4-4C3F-85CD-DAD133902118@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwaDuxFe48YqUE=225JcYBakKYcqi-NyDFQ0mhWD4WCYWw@mail.gmail.com> <AE74DBB9-6048-453F-ABB6-882AA5733046@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwZK52kkKouNaSUavNTmCiiUc_B3d3sqaShUgVr5HyUUFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAE5F6A6-F4B8-4BB4-899A-05CB5A02C8C0@akamai.com>, <68B3F1DE-C552-4817-90BB-2DE11EB6974C@akamai.com> <MW4PR17MB4729344A64625F16A3A832ABAA509@MW4PR17MB4729.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/FIgc8DeOjoCvarzCdg0QPytFgI4>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-36: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 18:42:45 -0000

On Fri, 14 May 2021, Rob Stradling wrote:

> Although TRANS is set to wind down without really looking beyond 6962-bis, the original Charter also envisaged exploring
> "mechanisms and techniques that allow cryptographically verifiable logs to be deployed to improve the security of protocols other
> than HTTP over TLS, for example SMTP/TLS or software distribution", and this was a consideration when we planned the
> (sub-)registries that 6962-bis requests to be created.  Perhaps there will be renewed interest in exploring such things in the
> future, and if so, it's conceivable that folks will want to reuse mechanisms from 6962-bis and reuse the (sub-)registries.
> 
> So I would prefer to name the new, main registry "Public Notary Transparency" (the full name of this WG -
> see https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/trans), and either (i) strip the "CT " prefix from the sub-registry names or (ii) change the
> prefix from "CT " to "Transparency ".
> 
> Does that make sense?

(no hats on)

It makes sense to me.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email