IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-36: (with DISCUSS)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 14 May 2021 05:24 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5993A2362; Thu, 13 May 2021 22:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r3yEy4v5wbtA; Thu, 13 May 2021 22:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8685D3A2361; Thu, 13 May 2021 22:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com with SMTP id j13so14743142vsf.2; Thu, 13 May 2021 22:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vpsODJAc2vVjCqEAIyOeadSFhlJe5qSqMbDB7Tz+Jg8=; b=jLUXoYl1MmSuy5tUI3lY6oslLMxg8U036lcU/YWQrwhUgaEiOzYNbhBq1JoYJel1LM 36oOZpTzQpV4mFxsdL+ZgGDYJCQENHripzXITVFVvKGDTYomW0vysrqVuLKyQvwM8xNX 5ynQKVhwlTfMid4MVAKSM4rYLX+IBglUa0Kd0Hndy9XSr+7oaod7diPRVQN8tVIMQZn/ dF15TmBRGsfrSeylmhZa/Gh2x62WBqiX+K56eN6/EKhp3EeFWVgcFS/oK9x9U5hUrqLV nsxQKNpEt7Qu2WWcHAFKzUs1TxrlUOEdZ+uAKe/1xgPMRVudiGQTEOGfSiJ5dC5snbij Toeg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vpsODJAc2vVjCqEAIyOeadSFhlJe5qSqMbDB7Tz+Jg8=; b=h/Rwp2ZKyvqMC/BmYN7G9UMAANUbQDgUcin+Z3BNi1dS8aBQrumacwWVO4bukNSWA1 kkgi8+RZMwwiPrr2sAPVJki3s3bfUGwklCPmzjj85Z431Vlhnbd/vM1Y3nCeYccCutBt fHl+eIwXgpNOFETDe1pS8H8i295vBkxw8oLYwt4l/UhoB+0vCCNqZWiLRQ2Y6RjN78j0 5MrMFR0wP2EaNIuAFuJEhe09jevVk9ONIByhEOen9ZoJs+vY7iMNYMzyMiJkrZGw0zEb X0HFmvWkyrKcbvo5LpgvRuxhFAeaR8vY0DSsnSwtc7ebBTwA34JKglYuYobh+pxCxqqt +J7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530anEJ89H6pQmo5+L/NK1EHuk8BdVi2asZmngsWhjcnEx6PyOOW hmeEz4i2dieaLr2Vbi3dynqxI4o4Lf6Jm1G8CN8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyaVomFKwX5rFZuzVCqUTFOmJzAb3P7xuVs7Phv8OZmbnX5Sentgd0SF0G8cBus+ilohElTbSwhfWNbhBg4bpQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:1a45:: with SMTP id a66mr4609173vsa.15.1620969877648; Thu, 13 May 2021 22:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162092843952.1774.17184633862596345877@ietfa.amsl.com> <18343E4C-99E4-4C3F-85CD-DAD133902118@akamai.com> <CAL0qLwaDuxFe48YqUE=225JcYBakKYcqi-NyDFQ0mhWD4WCYWw@mail.gmail.com> <AE74DBB9-6048-453F-ABB6-882AA5733046@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <AE74DBB9-6048-453F-ABB6-882AA5733046@akamai.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 22:24:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZK52kkKouNaSUavNTmCiiUc_B3d3sqaShUgVr5HyUUFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis@ietf.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>, "trans-chairs@ietf.org" <trans-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bfb91c05c24375e3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/bWsFxA3SCTre_lwqgiSIShxMXYw>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-36: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 05:24:45 -0000

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 6:53 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> But they are not new TLS sub-registries.  They are new CT registries.  Are
> we missing some text that makes this clear?
>
Well maybe I'm making some wrong assumptions here.  Here's the question
from another angle:

It looks like you're making six related registries in Sections 10.2.1
through 10.2.6.  Would it make sense to create a main registry called
"Certificate Transparency Parameters" that contains these six
sub-registries?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email