IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Experiment report: The MMD is a lie

Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Fri, 03 March 2017 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <kurt@roeckx.be>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E311295C9 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 11:29:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dtyd3m1L8LJz for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 11:29:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from excelsior.roeckx.be (excelsior.roeckx.be [IPv6:2a01:70:ffff:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E0081295C6 for <trans@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 11:29:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from intrepid.roeckx.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by excelsior.roeckx.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC28A8A098D; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:29:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by intrepid.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 17C101FE07EE; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 20:29:51 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 20:29:51 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Message-ID: <20170303192951.xqcdta6uc2ukgriv@roeckx.be>
References: <CAL02cgTXMqQre_iqUwu7O+WvuArWYFLQOLCoTdC_nqdNY+15dg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgTXMqQre_iqUwu7O+WvuArWYFLQOLCoTdC_nqdNY+15dg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/UH4z5SK1otGSMEmFD9m9W8HlvMQ>
Cc: Zakir Durumeric <zakir@umich.edu>, Nick Sullivan <nick@cloudflare.com>, trans@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Trans] Experiment report: The MMD is a lie
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 19:29:59 -0000

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 06:58:49PM -0500, Richard Barnes wrote:
> The upshot is that this style of logging seems eminently feasible.  Almost
> all CT logs are growing at well less than 10qps [2], and even Let's Encrypt
> on its worst days only generates about 115qps.  And I have pretty high
> confidence that if you actually put some thought into designing the storage
> scheme, you could get some additional margin here.

Let's encrypt seems to be doing around 1M per day on "its worst
days", which is still only in the range of 10 per second.


Kurt

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status