Re: [Trans] Experiment report: The MMD is a lie

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Fri, 03 March 2017 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCAE1294E1 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 07:59:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HrI7AhHfXJgv for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 07:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EA881294CC for <trans@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 07:59:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id v186so18711217wmd.0 for <trans@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 07:59:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nyGDP7Adf+d5lZV70koyH5/ZB85IPdfMFAihu2jzNB8=; b=ct3W4PMd0znNCcA+oW25xxNGy8uivA/CE/8zcTQXHhmjw3x1vPraGHpA6g3O5Uf/LZ xq8YMBjcChMKr8T9rNfY/31NDw/jM2BwUbMQKVICkYQO1hES2df0gemLGsQkZrFQPTIV fECxJ7OsPZx/bFj+oAK3fef3QpfNHWJkJLo6rmbc7caFPGHAu3ce6buaeZr4O+68cQ+g KXQJmJYKW1bPAWOm0C4Y5Ohn00bqJuSTC743C8epUk9HdmJRhFaCxVi3aKwtvBrr73AH cFnnbHX5GNXN43ISahFOqxONst2yMz2VXQ5nd+xXeknOL2GGdR+UMSMCa2onSBsCjHHH +klw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nyGDP7Adf+d5lZV70koyH5/ZB85IPdfMFAihu2jzNB8=; b=PNsQCObO3vVHUs6y2I+qDDHCOoZPOLS8DBRUFiVE5MogkL9Rqbbzw4gjBkkEdBQWZo SvFFgMWzqHntz/8dJ2T/McVpOln0hEUR1L2ksnp/ai1i6qhdpztalIESJpd38b3mOnsL K0cnlv/vn23lORZZ8phTMAumbA1dKQXC3355bJgkxDZb6xccB/LF7l5V47i4o1PbuRtL vBtDkmehkK/12I7tPTjR3LBinLQrGS7vVO6D5Y/KOpB8eM6wqgVhqhsVolS/YUPjOAiq gMK2Vbh3c4eo9TB6AVn6Tx1eKDmUwi5HGCgokEfNSrX1b2oDOuTjiW0OkPF5SzpJ/uLm tTwA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l4U6MZyCB2Lg7zXhMLNhmm7UomnI69S2CtEsNkiH1j1vzHiQPZ+0LtTjkeeeyMTY/CW5f7komP83V/RQ==
X-Received: by 10.28.156.69 with SMTP id f66mr21297wme.56.1488556747785; Fri, 03 Mar 2017 07:59:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.31.2 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 07:59:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1703031036450.29807@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CAL02cgTXMqQre_iqUwu7O+WvuArWYFLQOLCoTdC_nqdNY+15dg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1703031036450.29807@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 10:59:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQHxmMahdAdZqqRQbWOYo_DXq5QVR9CQ863nV_qcif4pg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b7e2a2e20b00549d5a0cd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/JYyOmxLUENkSdrcdCXdJZ5RacpY>
Cc: Zakir Durumeric <zakir@umich.edu>, Nick Sullivan <nick@cloudflare.com>, Trans <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Experiment report: The MMD is a lie
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 15:59:10 -0000

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Richard Barnes wrote:
>
> Richard,
>
> This might not be quite the right list for this, but since I'm not aware
>> of a "ct-implementors" list, I thought
>> I'd go ahead and post it.
>>
>> tl;dr: Logging with live updates to the Merkle tree can be done at rates
>> of at least 10-150qps.
>>
>
> Thanks for the update. Am I right that this resolves your concerns about
> 6962bis, and that you no longer think the specification needs changing
> to support the expected load for the deployment you have in mind?
>
> I'm trying to determine if we are now ready to send the document to the
> IESG.
>

Short answer: No.

Longer answer: After a late-night pizza / scotch / whiteboard session with
Eran and a few others last week, I have some more focused asks.  I'll try
to get them written up this afternoon.

--Richard