IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Processing feedback from IESG review on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 29 July 2021 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE2A3A18C4 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.452, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MkoijZIENGKS for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69C363A18BE for <trans@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 16TJTcYS015269; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:37:10 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=pdbphKnhiEzaXz9IVE9EMMKUC5wSyC0g9EWJ0MyqSEQ=; b=Inx7KoA715Hc/2ZIHIIqnsXwxJviSEzm+YMfiuqt5JopA//hVWxJPoWVYR+QFc+sY6Yq TxvjEsGL866JgSy5P/X/Au2vqjuj2cAzmMuG5DmTCHcXlV7igWEQw5E9PFhxc/W5O3y7 kLv24c9M/9X1LlTIbfXuUNMonnuFz7SGoTinJeBAX0z+Qqr1qWh18UPrf2BIekMI81ZA emtiWM/LC56mpnY61hnXqEgpQfV/c94pKsYjsMQjyceNiRHWb57pHNxcAabXyR6vNrid N8LmdyjIi45X31DTaRVwWgHenCmCC1tk3CfnNjlrjQ79ghrKz27TX4d+7AY6r6fAm6Ja 6A==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a72-247-45-31.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.31] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 3a32n2uub7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:37:09 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 16TJXjwh030164; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:37:08 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.112]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3a36phg9jy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:37:08 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.23; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:37:08 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.023; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 14:37:08 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Trans <trans@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Trans] Processing feedback from IESG review on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis
Thread-Index: AQHXhLEdxcR7//COmUe73LEck6jOrg==
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:37:07 +0000
Message-ID: <4AC08E48-93DF-4E44-97A7-41E203B1EB9E@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.51.21071101
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <F2DC02308CBBDA41AD3437DAB3DD6924@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-07-29_16:2021-07-29, 2021-07-29 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=714 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2107140000 definitions=main-2107290119
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: bEIneGHLF44AvKgA8Z32QwLFtgVdYRBb
X-Proofpoint-GUID: bEIneGHLF44AvKgA8Z32QwLFtgVdYRBb
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-07-29_16:2021-07-29, 2021-07-29 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=673 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2107140000 definitions=main-2107290119
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 72.247.45.31) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint3
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/gv_HoHNkfvtioPlcKLIqpFldN9k>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Processing feedback from IESG review on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:37:18 -0000

>    ==[ Martin's comments
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis/ballot/*martin-duke

>    [Roman] Please respond the Martin's design questions

Where?

His basic premise, "that the Log ID changes frequently" is wrong.  We already have deployed TRANS servers capable of handling the output of LetsEncrypt, for example.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email