IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Call for adoption: draft-strad-trans-redaction-00

Peter Bowen <pzbowen@gmail.com> Sun, 20 November 2016 06:02 UTC

Return-Path: <pzbowen@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7920C12950C for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:02:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xrRBrZ6xzp7e for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:02:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0973D1294D8 for <trans@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:02:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id v84so130245876oie.3 for <trans@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:02:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pPxUdxigBaQcwH1gAKRr8idy9oyL8d2kZB2KSs8iarM=; b=xZc2QSRIiSiqxTdBWZfuAUsUr3685zFmcFRl5b32vdIqkX7RzefZ58U+Rfn9+Fiy62 ekx3azZsVjJ+cgJnrGKgSXzXwf7tExLakLw/+M0yQ9n9/bkO/y+pV6F084DBBzfj1meH MUKhHiK3jXg3My839ixDyT6/tpl9jyYXVB5rBTWYAXiMuVgWzA4QJUBCWbvEKA+ckFhU hNzALE4Z0YKJwOPWVfuwTrObydlPn0Z9BU1v8h17YC6FWnqrcQeSzQttqNpKAQYHVmsI /uidEhQUZjJOxilTeCtxPg7WDT8gqjK7QY7/dKKp6yOQp6lLnoXUkzb8zNlZd8awH6NP 3cWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pPxUdxigBaQcwH1gAKRr8idy9oyL8d2kZB2KSs8iarM=; b=WkIKohrIAKWHrdAdAm18FL6hDVyvpXTPZcaWD9N/SqIx2RBHgCJfSyUFL+CxNmXIYT ugTbvlVVg/vjzbOJfM6npOFzKl2ElvawobNheQRxj6YQ3QSMISygo3GM5vizV96sXt6A rySVpsEviLqmKGIR22kTakqlyyU4ujKE1Pb9g1q+cETaBDZUT6YlorMWWpXx+Q1l0oyW U5wqn6eQM8yFRPjgLbezHV75elaxaMJtRpG3iDL2XmcQooWxOWqzvIsrbhDabjg4IE3W 65ZghpYviB98KEzkgZHZMbHUeDt3DBQCnnjrcTLis/WEgTf6HbH2rwoWnb0uWdY0gB8I oUBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02tNKZkf9Re1gSTwzzme9Ko5CNl3AZaf1asa/SlNZ92bNIzBDcRC1O3v6/ChZ64E+NYmCgkuK0yDRyFvA==
X-Received: by 10.202.79.203 with SMTP id d194mr4330966oib.46.1479621742357; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:02:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.76.14 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:02:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D452271D.1DE4%tarah_wheeler@symantec.com>
References: <b7a2d798-0201-4341-0b3b-c5efff34b126@gmail.com> <5b357047-d412-70de-4aa6-9499fa8837b5@comodo.com> <CABrd9SRpg2kMdQahfVUVpvy5e6tnLMKcv-Ka56vB4_QqgLoCWA@mail.gmail.com> <ccb1675a-6215-305c-9ca5-ff12edbc2b60@gmail.com> <D40801F0.1533%tarah_wheeler@symantec.com> <c8a14597-e2f9-7270-33f3-861dc8d1ada5@gmail.com> <D40AEC5D.1746%tarah_wheeler@symantec.com> <5290c544-97b1-7530-eb0c-e9b62d8ebc71@comodo.com> <2775E6CC-A288-4681-A14F-19A775EDFF15@symantec.com> <CALzYgEfCtpa9EysxMLZ6O5L72osUUE9ifnyDowuRvHEXN-eCNQ@mail.gmail.com> <D452271D.1DE4%tarah_wheeler@symantec.com>
From: Peter Bowen <pzbowen@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:02:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK6vND-eH=8LaWEgkg=Q5Cebr7y1jLnh1rJVjcHde5Q9wsquDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tarah Wheeler <Tarah_Wheeler@symantec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/wOUetu_IOItjYV1e_4bDd6FtMc0>
Cc: Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com>, "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>, Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Call for adoption: draft-strad-trans-redaction-00
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 06:02:24 -0000

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Tarah Wheeler
<Tarah_Wheeler@symantec.com> wrote:
>
> I’ve watched this situation be cautiously talked around for months now, and
> I’d be interested to hear people’s thoughts on asking some unassailably
> corporate-neutral experts on both sides of this debate to provide guidance.
> Whose opinion are you interested in hearing on whether or not permitting
> certificate privacy and accepting it as a browser standard is a good idea?
> I’m putting myself and Symantec out there in a vulnerable way; I and we
> might not always hear what we want to hear, but every one of us wants to
> make the internet better in the way we believe will work best.

Tarah,

There have been multiple requests for use cases to be brought to the
group.  I have brought some use cases from a group discussion outside
the IETF and others have contributed well.  We also know that the IETF
has addressed DNS privacy in several WGs, including the DNSEXT WG,
which developed DNSSEC Hashed Authenticated Denial of Existence (aka
NSEC3), and the DPRIVE WG which published DNS Privacy Considerations
(RFC 7626).

What guidance are you hoping the WG will get by asking for
"corporate-neutral experts"?  How does that align with the rough
consensus model used in WGs?

Thanks,
Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email