IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rbridge] Call for draft-tissa-trill-cmt-00 to WG draft

Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 05 April 2012 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rbridge-bounces@postel.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-trill-archive-Osh9cae4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-trill-archive-Osh9cae4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4AF21F870E for <ietfarch-trill-archive-Osh9cae4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RnOcSl5RoHgG for <ietfarch-trill-archive-Osh9cae4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE3621F870B for <trill-archive-Osh9cae4@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q35FFLkP000615; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com (mail-pz0-f41.google.com [209.85.210.41]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q35FEpfR000543 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <rbridge@postel.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dajx4 with SMTP id x4so1996967daj.0 for <rbridge@postel.org>; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:14:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=svjrsn+zm8amKyPWNux2CUBgy8SYuANTdh4CcovgcvI=; b=cR3FUGtY/1DiXzonzvtDgzn91c6jZCmTwR2W5EGWchT7y9znX+bsAvA0dgKM7HM8j1 EkP9RjPRR3miQz8ncBhTozTAdxnOcRKDI83AvfzSKPn//WtPK1vz1IZdqNyGaqzYX83X 045Sq7GvRZvkvjNvGqt8cs5QJgZcEW4xwiNUC5LRMCxIL2KL7T1EGH2HT53pFwBWYbz7 8fRIPYRRYhbrBTP3JKv50xixvwd8V+FjWrh3LfJtudsUWxC+ojyRDZP5WtJ8tsQulzGt S4S5fyUD3HDSJogbpTSsSDaiKAXlMWmM2N6mIrdhjznotCeWAsgwrISm7VTY5jTxuRMp tPqQ==
Received: by 10.68.197.39 with SMTP id ir7mr8166309pbc.17.1333638890888; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (c-107-3-156-34.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [107.3.156.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b10sm3498807pbr.46.2012.04.05.08.14.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:14:44 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CBA283BF.2B79F%ayabaner@cisco.com> <344037D7CFEFE84E97E9CC1F56C5F4A5E3B778@xmb-sjc-214.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <344037D7CFEFE84E97E9CC1F56C5F4A5E3B778@xmb-sjc-214.amer.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-Id: <E46AD794-E0F3-4CCD-AD15-5FBFFA1D6C46@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B176)
From: Sam Aldrin <aldrin.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:14:43 -0700
To: "Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" <tsenevir@cisco.com>
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: aldrin.ietf@gmail.com
Cc: "<rbridge@postel.org>" <rbridge@postel.org>
Subject: Re: [rbridge] Call for draft-tissa-trill-cmt-00 to WG draft
X-BeenThere: rbridge@postel.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <rbridge.postel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge>, <mailto:rbridge-request@postel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/rbridge>
List-Post: <mailto:rbridge@postel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rbridge-request@postel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge>, <mailto:rbridge-request@postel.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0456448998=="
Sender: rbridge-bounces@postel.org
Errors-To: rbridge-bounces@postel.org

I support this draft to be adopted as WG document.
The solution proposed is least overhead and doesn't require unnecessary overhead of deploying certain topology. The arguments raised against thus far do not provide much simpler solution by any means. 

Cheers
Sam
Sent from my iPad

On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:28 AM, "Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" <tsenevir@cisco.com> wrote:

> +1 vote in support.
>  
> From: rbridge-bounces@postel.org [mailto:rbridge-bounces@postel.org] On Behalf Of Ayan Banerjee (ayabaner)
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 11:03 PM
> To: rbridge@postel.org
> Subject: Re: [rbridge] Call for draft-tissa-trill-cmt-00 to WG draft
>  
> Yes, I believe that this is an important piece of the puzzle and should be made a WG document. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Ayan
> ====
> 
> 
> 
> During the TRILL session today, there was a consensus of those in the
> room to make draft-tissa-trill-cmt-00.txt a TRILL WG draft. This is a
> call on the WG mailing list to confirm that consensus. If you wish to
> respond, please do so by April 10th.
> 
> Thanks,
> Donald
> _______________________________________________
> rbridge mailing list
> rbridge@postel.org
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge

_______________________________________________
rbridge mailing list
rbridge@postel.org
http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email