Re: [trill] AD review of draft-ietf-aa-multi-attach-03

Mingui Zhang <> Mon, 03 August 2015 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD50D1B2AD9; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 18:56:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0U3fEBKpn4eQ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 18:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69DE31B2A9D; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 18:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (EHLO ([]) by (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BVT91015; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 01:56:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 02:56:09 +0100
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:56:05 +0800
From: Mingui Zhang <>
To: Alia Atlas <>, "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: AD review of draft-ietf-aa-multi-attach-03
Thread-Index: AQHQy7PQsnrSkaZe8k6134tS6kHd7p35fijw
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 01:56:04 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E7871600FCnkgeml512mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [trill] AD review of draft-ietf-aa-multi-attach-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 01:56:17 -0000

Hi Alia,

We appreciate you review!

The suggested change is fair and we will incorporate it.

The issues on the references have been noted and will be addressed. The updated draft will address the comments from the Rtgdir review. Some simplification of language will be done. We will make it clear what the changes are.


From: Alia Atlas []
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 1:10 AM
Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-aa-multi-attach-03

First, I'd like to thank Mingui, Radia, Hongjun, Muhammad, and Sujay, the authors of this draft, for their work and for producing a draft that is clear and easy to understand.

As is customary, I've done my AD review of this draft.  I have only one minor quibble, listed below, so am requesting IETF Last Call and targeting this draft at the IESG telechat on August 20.  Having extremely responsive authors and shepherd during this time period is critical to making the draft progress quickly and well.

I do note in the shepherd's report that there are issues with a couple references.  Please do clean those up.  It's fine to post an updated draft while IETF Last Call is happening and better for the IESG to see what is as close to the final version (except for handling their comments) as possible.

Minor quibble:

1) In Sec 4.1, it says ""The advertisement of enabled Data
Labels for an LAALP can be realized by..."  This is a proposed standard draft.  Be declarative in the language, such as ""The advertisement of enabled Data
Labels for an LAALP is realized, as defined in this document, by..."

Otherwise, it looks good.  This seems like a useful approach.