Re: [trill] AD review of draft-ietf-aa-multi-attach-03

Mingui Zhang <> Thu, 06 August 2015 03:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440F41B36A5; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yudLBXkiFB27; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E33641B36A4; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (EHLO ([]) by (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BZO04959; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 03:06:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 04:06:51 +0100
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:06:48 +0800
From: Mingui Zhang <>
To: Alia Atlas <>, "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: AD review of draft-ietf-aa-multi-attach-03
Thread-Index: AQHQy7PQsnrSkaZe8k6134tS6kHd7p3+TMSw
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 03:06:46 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E787174212nkgeml512mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [trill] AD review of draft-ietf-aa-multi-attach-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 03:06:58 -0000

Hi Alia,

The updated version of the draft has been posted.

1. Your suggested change has been incorporated.
2. The shepherd comments have been checked. The references nits have been resolved.
3. The language of the introduction is simplified.
4. The draft now has a compact list of two options. I believe the minor issue pointed out by the Rtgdir (that there are too many nested ideas) has been resolved.
5. Some other editing or language changes.

No technical changes happen in the updating.


From: Alia Atlas []
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 1:10 AM
Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-aa-multi-attach-03

First, I'd like to thank Mingui, Radia, Hongjun, Muhammad, and Sujay, the authors of this draft, for their work and for producing a draft that is clear and easy to understand.

As is customary, I've done my AD review of this draft.  I have only one minor quibble, listed below, so am requesting IETF Last Call and targeting this draft at the IESG telechat on August 20.  Having extremely responsive authors and shepherd during this time period is critical to making the draft progress quickly and well.

I do note in the shepherd's report that there are issues with a couple references.  Please do clean those up.  It's fine to post an updated draft while IETF Last Call is happening and better for the IESG to see what is as close to the final version (except for handling their comments) as possible.

Minor quibble:

1) In Sec 4.1, it says ""The advertisement of enabled Data
Labels for an LAALP can be realized by..."  This is a proposed standard draft.  Be declarative in the language, such as ""The advertisement of enabled Data
Labels for an LAALP is realized, as defined in this document, by..."

Otherwise, it looks good.  This seems like a useful approach.