Re: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-cmt

Hi,Tissa

Yes，that's exactly what I mean. :)
Should the CMT take this scenario into account？

Thanks,
Tina

"Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)" <tsenevir@cisco.com> 
发件人:  trill-bounces@ietf.org
2012-11-26 00:50

收件人
"liao.ting@zte.com.cn" <liao.ting@zte.com.cn>
抄送
"trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
主题
Re: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-cmt

Hi Tina

I am not sure I completely understand your question. Are you referring to 
a scenario where some of the members (e.g. RB1 ) are using some manual 
configuration and other is using the proposed method (e.g. RB2) in the CMT 
draft ?

PS: Both RB1 and RB2 are members of the virtual RBridge RBv

From: liao.ting@zte.com.cn [mailto:liao.ting@zte.com.cn] 
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 10:05 PM
To: Tissa Senevirathne (tsenevir)
Cc: trill@ietf.org; trill-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [trill] draft-ietf-trill-cmt

Hi,Tissa 

Section 5.1 provides a simple general method to assign different trees to 
different members and it is easy to employ. 
But in my opinion, it could be better to allow co-existence of default 
manner（cmt） and manual configuration 
for distribution tree choosing，otherwise if some member RBs are manually 
configured and others are not configured at all, 
compatibility problem with the current algorithm could occur. 
So, maybe we should provide a unified tree distribution method which is 
compatible 
with manual configuration and can ensure different member RBs obtain 
different  distribution tree? 

Thanks,
Tina _______________________________________________
trill mailing list
trill@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill