IETF Logo Mail Archive

[trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016 - Second WG LC (3/7 to 3/20)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 04:29 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DD7129AF0; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:29:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CHMAdTAwdRQO; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C408A126D73; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:29:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=70.194.16.251;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: trill@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 23:24:43 -0500
Message-ID: <010201d296fa$bf7f7f40$3e7e7dc0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0103_01D296D0.D6AAFDE0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdKW+okay2QbsVyDTfmwcEjhs1omWg==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/uvxtGnxiQfa9ZwBnnSjC35X6rcQ>
Cc: trill-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016 - Second WG LC (3/7 to 3/20)
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 04:29:44 -0000

We did not receive any comments on the WGLC for draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt
(https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg07692.html).
Perhaps this was because I started the WG LC during Chinese new year.   We
will try a second WG LC before declaring "no support for this draft"  

 

In your comments please consider,

1)      Does the support of multi-point BFD aid deployments?

2)      Are the suggested additions to RFC7177 bootstrapping sufficient for
this technology?

3)      Do you feel this technology is ready for standardization?

 

Sue Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email