Re: [trill] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiations-04.txt

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Sun, 14 August 2016 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0CB12D7E2; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 14:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wtnqowG63-43; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 14:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9149712D7D8; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 14:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.176.249.55;
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 17:22:41 -0400
Message-ID: <363o12jbado0qjo2xjr5yms8.1471209761748@email.android.com>
Importance: normal
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: Mingui Zhang <zhangmingui@huawei.com>, "trill@ietf.org" <trill@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.samsung.android.email_397651935290430"
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/vsEFsFVxWT2IEAsK7Sye2lS-hcg>
Cc: 'Donald Eastlake' <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation@ietf.org>, "somnath.chatterjee01@gmail.com" <somnath.chatterjee01@gmail.com>, "radia@alum.mit.edu" <radia@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [trill] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiations-04.txt
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:22:52 -0000

Submitting -05.txt is great.  
Sue


Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: Mingui Zhang <zhangmingui@huawei.com> Date: 8/11/16  2:29 AM  (GMT-05:00) To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>om>, trill@ietf.org Cc: 'Donald Eastlake' <d3e3e3@gmail.com>om>, draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation@ietf.org, somnath.chatterjee01@gmail.com, radia@alum.mit.edu Subject: Re: [trill] Shepherd review of	draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiations-04.txt 


Hi Sue,
 
Thanks for the comments! Please take a look at my responses inline.
 



From: Susan Hares [mailto:shares@ndzh.com]


Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 4:15 AM

To: trill@ietf.org

Cc: draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiation@ietf.org; Mingui Zhang; 'Donald Eastlake'; somnath.chatterjee01@gmail.com; radia@alum.mit.edu

Subject: Shepherd review of draft-ietf-trill-mtu-negotiations-04.txt 



 
 
Status of draft: Ready for publication, a few editorial nits

 
Concerns:  None 
 
WG Request/Reminder:  We’ll need to make sure these parameters update the TRILL Yang data model.

 
Editorial NITs:
 

1.      
Section 2 Page 5, before first paragraph

     The text would be clear if prior to the first paragraph beginning “lz is reported”, you add a section header with: “operations” as title.

 
[Mingui] Yes, good point! This has been done in the attached 05 version.
 

2.      
Section 3 page 6 
 
Step 0, #2, b 
 
Old:/Repeat step 1/ to 
New: /Repeat/Do step 1/ 
 
I think the first time through, you have not gotten to Step 1:.

 
[Mingui] That’s true.  I think it would also be fine if this phase (Do step 1) is deleted.

 
If this is not true, then this becomes a concern rather than a nit.

 

3.      
Section 4, page 8, paragraph 0, sub-paragraph 2). Paragraph begins

 
/2) when an Rbridge/
 
It may be nice to explain why only equal is treated.

 
-         
Less than Sz, it is not in campus

-         
Greater than Sz, some other trill Rbridge has limiting size
-         
Only if equal to Sz, it is possible that it changes Sz.

 
[Mingui] Yes, It’s clearer. I have listed these three possibilities with three bullets.
 
Sue Hares
 
So, I will submit the 05 version if there is no objection to above responses.
 
Thanks,
Mingui