Re: [trill] [rbridge] Query on draft-ietf-trill-esadi-00

hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn Mon, 16 July 2012 02:33 UTC

Return-Path: <hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6790411E80BA; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.335
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.335 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id quK0EbuS9b-x; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9C711E80B7; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:33:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.99] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 514961455586978; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:30:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 16919.2371961387; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:34:15 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id q6G2Y9sg048668; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:34:09 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <CAPFewY0pv8E69czT+qBRh0ViJQjD7s4ZuH2U9OYzJqQUwVc1BA@mail.gmail.com>
To: somnath chatterjee <somnath.chatterjee01@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.4 June 01, 2004
Message-ID: <OF99AB767E.D54D150A-ON48257A3D.000B28B7-48257A3D.000E1CF2@zte.com.cn>
From: hu.fangwei@zte.com.cn
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:34:09 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2012-07-16 10:34:10, Serialize complete at 2012-07-16 10:34:10
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000E1CEF48257A3D_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn q6G2Y9sg048668
Cc: trill-bounces@ietf.org, trill@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [trill] [rbridge] Query on draft-ietf-trill-esadi-00
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 02:33:34 -0000

Hi, chatterjee.

Thanks for your comments

Please see my comment in inline.

>Hi Authors,

>I have few comments and a query about  draft-ietf-trill-esadi-00.

1> Section 4.2 Receipt of ESADI PDUs

>   "Because all ESADI instance for VLAN-x are adjacent, when RB1
>receives an ESADI-CSNP from RB2 and detects that it has ESADI-LSPs
>that RB1 is missing, it sets the transmission flag only for its own
>ESADI-LSPs that RB1 is missing. Missing ESADI-LSPs originated by other
> ESADI instances will be detected by those other instances."

>   I am not able to understand the quoted sentences.Could you please 
clarify?

[hfw] I think this is simiar with the ISIS flooding mechanism.

RB1 receives ESADI-CSNP from RB2, RB2 may DRB or not. ESADI-LSP contains 
LSP list.

If the LSP list can not contain the LSP originated by RB1, or the LSP 
stored in RB1 locally is newer than the received list,
RB1 sets the transimission flag for its own originated LSP. If the 
transimission time out, RB1 should multicast its originated LSP.

If the LSP in the ESADI-CSNP LSP list is newer than the its local, a 
ESADI-PSNP will be schedule to send in the network.

>2> The figure 2 and 3 in Section 2. ESADI Protocol Overview have the
>Inner MAC DA as "Next Hop Dest. Address"   which should be
>"All-Egress-RBridges" (formerly called "All-ESADI-RBridges")

 [hfw]You are right. There is some editor's error in the figure.

In figure 2 & 3 in ESADI draft, the Inner MAC DA should be 
"All-Egress-RBridges". 

In figure 2, the Outer MAC DA as "All-RBrides Multicast Address" should be 
"Next Hop Dest. Address", because both unicast and multicast ESADI frames 
are supported by ESADI.  

>3> In Section 6. ESADI-LSP Contents
>   "ESADI-LSP number zero MUST NOT exceed 1470 minus 24 bytes in
>length (1446 bytes) but if received longer, it is still processed
>normally."
>
>   should be changed to
>
>   "The ESADI payload for ESADI-LSP number zero MUST NOT exceed 1470
>minus 24 bytes in length  (1446 bytes) but if received longer, it is
>still processed normally."
>Also should it be 1470-24 or Sz-24 ? Sz being the campus wide MTU.

[hfw] Ok




somnath chatterjee <somnath.chatterjee01@gmail.com> 
发件人:  trill-bounces@ietf.org
2012-07-12 20:32

收件人
trill@ietf.org
抄送

主题
[trill] [rbridge] Query on draft-ietf-trill-esadi-00






Hi Authors,

I have few comments and a query about  draft-ietf-trill-esadi-00.

1> Section 4.2 Receipt of ESADI PDUs

   "Because all ESADI instance for VLAN-x are adjacent, when RB1
receives an ESADI-CSNP from RB2 and detects that it has ESADI-LSPs
that RB1 is missing, it sets the transmission flag only for its own
ESADI-LSPs that RB1 is missing. Missing ESADI-LSPs originated by other
ESADI instances will be detected by those other instances."

   I am not able to understand the quoted sentences.Could you please 
clarify?

2> The figure 2 and 3 in Section 2. ESADI Protocol Overview have the
Inner MAC DA as "Next Hop Dest. Address"   which should be
"All-Egress-RBridges" (formerly called "All-ESADI-RBridges")

3> In Section 6. ESADI-LSP Contents
   "ESADI-LSP number zero MUST NOT exceed 1470 minus 24 bytes in
length (1446 bytes) but if received longer, it is still processed
normally."

   should be changed to

   "The ESADI payload for ESADI-LSP number zero MUST NOT exceed 1470
minus 24 bytes in length  (1446 bytes) but if received longer, it is
still processed normally."
Also should it be 1470-24 or Sz-24 ? Sz being the campus wide MTU.

Thank you,
Regards,
Somnath
_______________________________________________
trill mailing list
trill@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill