Re: 37th IETF - SAN JOSE: SCHEDULING

James Watt <james@ca.newbridge.com> Sun, 29 September 1996 18:17 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa10655; 29 Sep 96 14:17 EDT
Received: from griffon.Cisco.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27753; 29 Sep 96 14:17 EDT
Received: from hubbub.cisco.com (hubbub.cisco.com [198.92.30.31]) by griffon.cisco.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id LAA00983 for <trunk-mib@aliashost.cisco.com>; Sun, 29 Sep 1996 11:11:08 -0700
Received: from ns.newbridge.com (ns.newbridge.com [192.75.23.67]) by hubbub.cisco.com (8.6.12/CISCO.GATE.1.1) with ESMTP id LAA15718; Sun, 29 Sep 1996 11:11:06 -0700
Received: (from adm@localhost) by ns.newbridge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA23956; Sun, 29 Sep 1996 14:10:57 -0400
Received: from portero(192.75.23.66) by ns via smap (V1.3) id sma023954; Sun Sep 29 14:10:53 1996
Received: from thor.ca.newbridge.com (thor.ca.newbridge.com [138.120.100.14]) by kanmaster.ca.newbridge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA29835; Sun, 29 Sep 1996 14:10:52 -0400
Received: from fields.newbridge (fields [138.120.136.143]) by thor.ca.newbridge.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA19401; Sun, 29 Sep 1996 14:10:52 -0400
From: James Watt <james@ca.newbridge.com>
Message-Id: <199609291810.OAA19401@thor.ca.newbridge.com>
Subject: Re: 37th IETF - SAN JOSE: SCHEDULING
To: Maria Greene <greene@nexen.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 14:10:50 -0400
Cc: fred@cisco.com, trunk-mib@cisco.com
In-Reply-To: <199609261945.PAA29701@avalon.nexen.com> from "Maria Greene" at Sep 26, 96 03:45:37 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1234

Maria Greene writes:
+--------
|Hi, Fred. I'm not sure about the draft-ietf-trunkmib-ds1-supp-00.txt
|document. (This was the supplemental MIB that has performance
|monitoring objects.) At the last IETF meeting I promised to make an
|effort to make a combined DS1/DS3/SONET supplemental MIB, but that has
|proven to be more of a challenge than it initially seemed. I could
|probably work up "clones" of the DS1 Supplemental MIB for DS3 and
|SONET in time for the November cut-off, however. 
|
|What do other people think? Are others sufficiently interested in
|having a standard MIB to cover these features (thresholding, reset,
|longer history, etc.)?
+---------
I'd really like to see a standard mechanism for this stuff.  We are
having enough troubles keeping the mechanisms consistent within a single
document (let alone across three).

Why don't we just take a crack at longer history for December - just in
case something else manages to crack the general thresholding case... ?

Regards,
-james

____________________________________________________________________________
James W. Watt,     james@newbridge.com                   Ph: +1 613 591-3600
Newbridge Networks 600 March Rd Kanata ON Canada K2K 2E6 FAX:+1 613 591-3680