Re: 37th IETF - SAN JOSE: SCHEDULING

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Mon, 30 September 1996 07:08 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa00763; 30 Sep 96 3:08 EDT
Received: from stilton.cisco.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa24551; 30 Sep 96 3:08 EDT
Received: from [171.69.126.173] (sl-chattel-03.cisco.com [171.69.126.173]) by stilton.cisco.com (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id XAA17537; Sun, 29 Sep 1996 23:55:55 -0700
X-Sender: fred@stilton.cisco.com (Unverified)
Message-Id: <v02140b0dae751baa2dda@[171.68.146.22]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 23:54:38 -0700
To: Maria Greene <greene@nexen.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: 37th IETF - SAN JOSE: SCHEDULING
Cc: trunk-mib@cisco.com

At 3:45 PM 9/26/96, Maria Greene wrote:
>Hi, Fred. I'm not sure about the draft-ietf-trunkmib-ds1-supp-00.txt
>document. (This was the supplemental MIB that has performance
>monitoring objects.) At the last IETF meeting I promised to make an
>effort to make a combined DS1/DS3/SONET supplemental MIB, but that has
>proven to be more of a challenge than it initially seemed. I could
>probably work up "clones" of the DS1 Supplemental MIB for DS3 and
>SONET in time for the November cut-off, however.

I can go either way. I'd prefer a single MIB, for obvious reasons, but if
that is challenging for semantic reasons, separate augments might be a
better way to go.

So why not go ahead and puttogether three drafts, and let's plan to discuss
this in San Jose, with view to finishing the work then.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I don't suffer from insanity.  I enjoy every minute of it.