Re: draft-ietf-atommib-perfhistTC-00.txt
Kaj Tesink <kaj@cc.bellcore.com> Mon, 29 April 1996 23:13 UTC
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20380; 29 Apr 96 19:13 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa20376; 29 Apr 96 19:13 EDT
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07235; 29 Apr 96 19:13 EDT
Received: from mail.bellcore.com (mail.bellcore.com [128.96.90.10]) by thumper.bellcore.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with SMTP id SAA21727 for <atommib@thumper.bellcore.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 18:54:34 -0400
Received: from eve (eve.bellcore.com) by mail.bellcore.com (5.65c/2.1) id AA26170; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 18:59:31 -0400
Received: from by eve (4.1/4.7) id AB14503; Mon, 29 Apr 96 19:00:58 EDT
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 19:00:58 -0400
X-Station-Sent-From: eve.bellcore.com
Message-Id: <9604292300.AB14503@eve>
X-Sender: kaj@eve.bellcore.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.1.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: "C. M. Heard/VVNET, Inc." <heard@vvnet.com>, atommib@thumper.bellcore.com, trunk-mib@cisco.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Kaj Tesink <kaj@cc.bellcore.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-atommib-perfhistTC-00.txt
At 01:19 PM 4/29/96 -0700, C. M. Heard/VVNET, Inc. wrote: >The current performance history I-D states that > >> -- Use of these TCs assumes the following: >> [ ... ] >> -- 0 The agent will keep the following objects per >> -- interface: >> -- >> -- xyzTimeElapsed OBJECT-TYPE >> -- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..899) >> -- STATUS current >> -- DESCRIPTION >> -- "The number of seconds that have elapsed since >> -- the beginning of the current error-measurement >> -- period." >> -- ::= { xxx } > >But in the SONET MIB xyzTimeElapsed is in the range 1..900 and has a >description clause which reads "The number of seconds, including partial >seconds, that have elapsed since the beginning of the current >error-measurement period." This is different from the other trunk MIBs >but is not being changed to align with them because such a change would >deprecate most of the SONET MIB (for no good reason). > >Shouldn't the commentary in the I-D be updated to acknowledge this practice? i guess we should point this out somewhere. thanks, Kaj > >Mike >-- >C. M. Heard >VVNET, Inc. phone: +1 408 247 9376 >4040 Moorpark Ave. Suite 206 fax: +1 408 244 3651 >San Jose, CA 95117 USA e-mail: heard@vvnet.com > > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ Kaj Tesink _/ _/ Bellcore _/ _/ - Broadband Data Services & Consulting vmail (908) 758-5254 _/ _/ 331 Newman Springs Rd. email kaj@cc.bellcore.com _/ _/ Red Bank, NJ 07701 faxmail (908) 758-4177 _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
- Re: draft-ietf-atommib-perfhistTC-00.txt C. M. Heard/VVNET, Inc.
- Re: draft-ietf-atommib-perfhistTC-00.txt Kaj Tesink