Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB
Ken Chapman <KChapman@Argon.com> Wed, 27 May 1998 13:31 UTC
Delivery-Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 09:31:43 -0400
Return-Path: KChapman@Argon.com
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns.cnri.reston.va.us [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id JAA01126 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 1998 09:31:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from kickme.cisco.com (kickme.cisco.com [198.92.30.42]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id JAA10382 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Wed, 27 May 1998 09:34:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from proxy2.cisco.com (proxy2.cisco.com [192.31.7.89]) by kickme.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.2-SunOS.5.5.1.sun4/CISCO.GATE.1.1) with ESMTP id GAA18147 for <trunk-mib@external.cisco.com>; Wed, 27 May 1998 06:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from smap@localhost) by proxy2.cisco.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) id GAA18892 for <trunk-mib@external.cisco.com>; Wed, 27 May 1998 06:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shultz.argon.com(208.234.161.2) by proxy2.cisco.com via smap (V2.0) id xma018872; Wed, 27 May 98 13:25:20 GMT
X-SMAP-Received-From: outside
Received: from aruba (aruba.argon.com [208.234.161.60]) by shultz.argon.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id JAA13267; Wed, 27 May 1998 09:13:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19980527091345.00950640@shultz.argon.com>
X-Sender: kchapman@shultz.argon.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 09:13:45 -0400
To: Kaj Tesink <kaj@cc.bellcore.com>, Kaj Tesink <kaj@cc.bellcore.com>
From: Ken Chapman <KChapman@Argon.com>
Subject: Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB
Cc: atommib@thumper.bellcore.com, trunk-mib@external.cisco.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Kaj, I have an issue with it. I agree with the three TC, but there is one missing: PerfDayCount. It is quite different from PerfTotalCount; it starts at a specific time each day an is the aggregate of the 96 15-minute interval in the subsequent 24-hour interval. This is in support of the requirements specified in ANSI T1.231-1993, clause 9.1.2.1 (Current day register and Recent day registers). (I assume that the purpose of the MIB work is to support industry standards!) Ken At 06:55 PM 5/26/98 -0400, Kaj Tesink wrote: >At 03:55 PM 5/26/98 -0400, Ken Chapman wrote: >>Kaj, >>What's the status of <draft-ietf-atommib-perfhistTC-01.txt>? >>Is it dead? >> Ken > >has been quality reviewed which resulted in minor comments. >i'm accommodating that now and will post in a few days > >kaj > > >> > >_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ >_/ _/ >_/ Kaj Tesink _/ >_/ Bellcore _/ >_/ Business Internet Professional Services vmail (732) 758-5254 _/ >_/ 331 Newman Springs Rd. email kaj@cc.bellcore.com _/ >_/ Red Bank, NJ 07701 faxmail (732) 758-2269 _/ >_/ _/ >_/ * NOTE AREA CODE CHANGE (908) --> (732) EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 1997 * _/ >_/ _/ >_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ > > >
- PerfHist-TC-MIB Ken Chapman
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Kaj Tesink
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Ken Chapman
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Rajesh Abbi
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB C. M. Heard/VVNET, Inc.
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB David Fowler
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Kaj Tesink
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Ken Chapman
- Re: DS1, DS3 and SONET Supplemental MIBs (WAS: Pe… C. M. Heard/VVNET, Inc.
- Re: DS1, DS3 and SONET Supplemental MIBs Kaj Tesink
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Jeff Johnson
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB C. M. Heard/VVNET, Inc.
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Rajesh Abbi
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Keith McCloghrie
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB David Fowler
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Randy Presuhn
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Rajesh Abbi
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Jeff Johnson
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Jeff Johnson
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB jeff
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB C. M. Heard/VVNET, Inc.
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Chunhui Teng
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Chunhui Teng
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Rajesh Abbi
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB jeff
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Rajesh Abbi
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB C. M. Heard/VVNET, Inc.
- Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB Ken Chapman