IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB

Kaj Tesink <kaj@cc.bellcore.com> Thu, 28 May 1998 13:22 UTC

Delivery-Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 09:22:05 -0400
Return-Path: kaj@cc.bellcore.com
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns.cnri.reston.va.us [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id JAA28489 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 May 1998 09:22:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from beasley.cisco.com (mailgate-sj-2.cisco.com [171.69.2.135]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id JAA15225 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Thu, 28 May 1998 09:24:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from proxy3.cisco.com (proxy3.cisco.com [192.31.7.90]) by beasley.cisco.com (8.8.4-Cisco.1/CISCO.GATE.1.1) with ESMTP id GAA24432 for <trunk-mib@external.cisco.com>; Thu, 28 May 1998 06:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from smap@localhost) by proxy3.cisco.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) id GAA28815 for <trunk-mib@external.cisco.com>; Thu, 28 May 1998 06:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tbird.cc.bellcore.com(128.96.96.114) by proxy3.cisco.com via smap (V2.0) id xma028794; Thu, 28 May 98 13:13:25 GMT
X-SMAP-Received-From: outside
Received: from joker ([128.96.91.46]) by tbird.cc.bellcore.com with SMTP id AA27741 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <trunk-mib@external.cisco.com>); Thu, 28 May 1998 09:09:29 -0400
Received: from kaj-1 (nv-ktesink.cc.bellcore.com) by joker (4.1/4.7) id AA02602; Thu, 28 May 98 09:12:17 EDT
X-Station-Sent-From: joker.bellcore.com
Message-Id: <9805281312.AA02602@joker>
X-Sender: kaj@joker.bellcore.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 09:11:51 -0400
To: atommib@thumper.bellcore.com, trunk-mib@external.cisco.com, David Fowler <davef@newbridge.com>, "C. M. Heard/VVNET, Inc." <heard@vvnet.com>
From: Kaj Tesink <kaj@cc.bellcore.com>
Subject: Re: PerfHist-TC-MIB
In-Reply-To: <356C871E.73F4CF4F@newbridge.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980527095847.18276D-100000@shell16.ba.best.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 05:36 PM 5/27/98 -0400, David Fowler wrote:
>> Why not put PerfDayCount
>> (and any other TCs needed to support the supplemental trunk MIBs) in a
>> Supplemental-PerfHist-TC-MIB?
>
>Exactly.  The trunk MIBs have taken forever to get out.  Let's get them done and
>then add new things.

I agree with this. And one more point:

It would be questionable to define TCs that are not actually used in
any MIB module (to date). We can only stick in TCs in the current 
TC module that are used elsewhere or where we are very sure
that 
a) they will be used elsewhere within the foreseeable future
b) they are correct

Ken asked recently whether there is interest in a Supplemental
SONET/SDH MIB that would be a potential user of such TCs.
Is there any interest? Ken has some good stuff that can be leveraged.

And what about the Supplemental DS0/1/2/3 MIBs?

Kaj




_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/                                                                      _/
_/  Kaj Tesink                                                          _/
_/  Bellcore                                                            _/
_/  Business Internet Professional Services  vmail (732) 758-5254       _/
_/  331 Newman Springs Rd.                   email kaj@cc.bellcore.com  _/
_/  Red Bank, NJ 07701                     faxmail (732) 758-2269       _/
_/                                                                      _/
_/  * NOTE AREA CODE CHANGE (908) --> (732) EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 1997 *    _/
_/                                                                      _/
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email