Re: Q on the congestion awareness of routing protocols

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 03 December 2022 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A44DC14CEE3; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 14:00:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uUy-sM8uYtWs; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 14:00:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA528C14F744; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 14:00:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.127] (p5089abf5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.171.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4NPkJg0tlczDCc5; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 23:00:35 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
Subject: Re: Q on the congestion awareness of routing protocols
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <C303F9BF-F96A-4710-A4B5-4228807C07F7@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 23:00:34 +0100
Cc: bier@ietf.org, tsv-area@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org, routing-discussion@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 691797634.648279-0ad40c21ae9c169845dced458c71b508
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A1821FC9-9889-4844-8AD5-37B5F12FA8C0@tzi.org>
References: <CAH56bmBnqi4peTWUXOVy0KRRXRc1L7TP+atFfVF6qb_OKBMBwg@mail.gmail.com> <C303F9BF-F96A-4710-A4B5-4228807C07F7@gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-area/YfczXa_VfsztLmd4UFZU-HJPZk8>
X-BeenThere: tsv-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Transport and Services Area Mailing List <tsv-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-area>, <mailto:tsv-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-area>, <mailto:tsv-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 22:00:45 -0000

Do not read if you don’t want coals for Christmas.

Grüße, Carsten





On 2022-12-03, at 11:22, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> One thought is that we set up a shadow RRG operating independently of the IETF 

Why does [1] come to my mind immediately?  That was not set up as an IRTF RG either…

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Research_Group