IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsv-art] do we need a checklist or guidelines?

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Wed, 19 July 2017 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418CF126C83 for <tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pisz-LTDHbip for <tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46BD2126B7F for <tsv-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.184.233] ([128.9.184.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v6JJodhm010820 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)" <michael.scharf@nokia.com>, "tsv-art@ietf.org" <tsv-art@ietf.org>
References: <44b6345c-359b-65b3-d71e-3210f676fbbc@isi.edu> <AM5PR0701MB2547BB340CBCD0D1BB4F2B5D93A60@AM5PR0701MB2547.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Message-ID: <a261657f-d6b7-842f-8a83-b1447b3ca068@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 12:50:37 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR0701MB2547BB340CBCD0D1BB4F2B5D93A60@AM5PR0701MB2547.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/89V_a18qpM8i24mGmcgfkXAUBxQ>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] do we need a checklist or guidelines?
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 19:53:15 -0000


On 7/19/2017 11:34 AM, Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart) wrote:
> l deal with the LWIG document (to ensure TCPM review) and as of now I don't think I need any formal checklist for that specific document. 
I just posted a related request for clarification to LWIG. Can you
contact me directly with your thoughts on that?

> Also, we decided to publish documents such as DCTCP for somewhat controlled environments. 
Sure - OK, so the list below needs some tweaking, of course. It needs to
be "relatively friendly to TCPs in the same environment", at least.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email