[Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-07

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 29 February 2024 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B726C18DBBA; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 06:40:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.6.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <170921763249.22720.16842526143673774570@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 06:40:32 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/KY78wEYzfDHjFx4mypnUul3-AEw>
Subject: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-07
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:40:32 -0000

Reviewer: Mirja Kühlewind
Review result: On the Right Track

This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

I did an early TSV review a few weeks ago and the current version addresses a
lot of the comments and is an improvement.

On the high level I still think the document can be further improves by
recommending and discussion appropriate default values or values ranges to
ensure safe operation as implementors often reply on default value and if no
recommendation is given or discussed this can lead easy to a selection of too
high values that would overload the other end.

Also the congestion control part seems rather complex for a point-to-point
connection. I understand that the proposed mechanism was experimented with and
showed improvements in case of overload of the internal switch. However,
congestion control usually also aims to fully utilise the available resources
which is not a goal here and therefore a simpler solution like a circuit
breaker would probably be sufficient.