Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46

Nabil Benamar <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma> Fri, 05 July 2019 11:23 UTC

Return-Path: <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9356D12001B for <tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 04:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=est-umi-ac-ma.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t9sgOKcHznRJ for <tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 04:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04EA812001E for <tsv-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2019 04:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id z3so3455082iog.0 for <tsv-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 04:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=est-umi-ac-ma.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=87znNZ+nVllTRd6pzCg3Xj0+vxHyOonn/WVVwtSQsCM=; b=a3oZETC36HIS7O+Bw4EGSMMZgjySEEpPxNWVXcy+lfo749rwsaOXiT2l4ayabPBE4G mQEIUwkViRRC0+IjHFK44Nrd8XkWdiBqlABYxUtsVLIeN2FsfOaOrrftS5ShT4pOULqY i+N5eihWAn8LII7tLLwtcMHEsdKtE++vQ6Yk5Vst+RphlnxX0qRMi+ODMBIbLfepK4RD QRdEqUhNRJ5zhvBE/pMa79DMbxF4IwHj/WqYUf+xByHRjlwpDULuLLfgsgq7RecDYm6L D7MZdByJiz155e52o2DRIBrVPJGd1ASc7JP+bF1vnsnPQFpWeWxPvFOcpG3h5JadBJle EiWg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=87znNZ+nVllTRd6pzCg3Xj0+vxHyOonn/WVVwtSQsCM=; b=C0Sz9tR7cE8ei1FYzO27z0nqVbFBdQFg6sJbnaUj5C5bwl+hGGPi7bqW06Gd8LPF4F q/G22t6uh5/BxFgdRbFTRhW5gCMnjx2BnThX/QgecjJejB58HQaTQ3b1+GY89/njApJg d5svAQRRYvnEMQkdXQrP4m/OAAQqdWH4jPwRpmm4F4lYgGob1wHyCqwfvKBDkAQj42b+ BEeVwU9uc0/3KDGn5eWzPkCLS3jSddFDYnQKYvmQzDkBCpMExxlMTW3obcVbscDKQbTi olgGE9OMcW7P09w7s6Hmd+BsIHKBwhFI1LFE/NKKJJXFuLchH+A1QUVmN2zPtSky2ITS Wqxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXeeBLNcen+8Ac/TsbERbhtRKgkJoZUtL3sTjZTq9Y0wdI6RiTa Z+lwD3f4uN6nMpnrO/huLwaFA23HhsLGSJHiQsf/WQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyF2fZwCNE+efjACSQCuRPyXuADU7OPfmrYoWX1zgl+yUNpdMwbI9n7rbqjbLz0rkGCf5PV0xoENpqDzSqeIFk=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:691d:: with SMTP id e29mr3324670ioc.96.1562325825198; Fri, 05 Jul 2019 04:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156165351682.21357.6959207590092474225@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156165351682.21357.6959207590092474225@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Nabil Benamar <n.benamar@est.umi.ac.ma>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 12:23:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD8vqFePS38gqw2k5rXb2mCTp0Urak_bA8n-gXHF042=jq5PDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joerg Ott <jo@acm.org>
Cc: tsv-art@ietf.org, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, its@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d5b217058ced533d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/STWn-no8YBTwgx2iGUo3DI4fUEw>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-46
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 11:23:49 -0000

Dear Joerg,

I want to add more clarification to one of your comments


> sect 4.6: Clarify "A subnet may be formed over 802.11-OCB interfaces of
> vehicles that are in close range (not by their in-vehicle interfaces)."
> further.
>

The in-vehicle interface is the Ethernet interface of a Router situated in
the car.  By default, a Router has many and different interfaces. This
Router (in the car) has an Ethernet interface (in-vehicle) and an
802.11-OCB interface.  That OCB interface has an antenna towards the
outside of the car.

The subnet referred to by this text, is formed by the OCB interfaces (not
the Ethernet interfaces - 'in-vehicle') of the cars nearby.
The 'in-vehicle' interface can be Ethernet, Bluetooth or even WiFi (WiFi
onboard).

>
>
>
>
>

-- 

Best Regards

Nabil Benamar
Associate Professor
Department of Computer Sciences
School of Technology
Moulay Ismail University
Meknes. Morocco