IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsv-art] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 09 February 2022 19:55 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsv-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5A03A0B22; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:55:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.812
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.812 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2_Xdoc00k9kK; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6423D3A0AD9; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id 9so3253182pfx.12; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:55:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kehUiCFcfS3yigJBoAzViE+wwsEXH5fiPnI9anMW9j8=; b=nuoywprPrVPHZDiDrBI2CTjN/EQuEawXozD5s6TaU7B5YLzf3DH2m9qrYYr5Wb/vEg cDmJxcdCh2zkqt/vl8bZCiOHeHKw+0BOtJwRBy5a8dbukmeWro9LY+XIJUvIp1/0Aura /VqN46a5CwP8KYQhpXyGA1LgKbGjNxaDJa+4gKS+GIpfzLkpzYvZxucYjl+aelW4JA2m ernmMTY+awi/vbl3SChJJM4usgCHv+YQiVKK9VrogCaAOXwPFaYugIqVaiKL06TyTv/Z 5pDqTmYHqY/a8RlMN+NnmMASR51lEXavPusUI9ObLz+KoUMi99eVtyjYTiZc3F2aPnTd ZQkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kehUiCFcfS3yigJBoAzViE+wwsEXH5fiPnI9anMW9j8=; b=CBSz8MDq+DQ9r1N6fxJ3hs5v9sThTijJSg1okHe67O0wvgOc7N1eHD8nfAhhJxp2HI HJlOJ9V2fnGPhQRfxqIg2Zf6FvC6uxFL/LCEqJwn/dKCThBK7eRy68vXFRi9459ugr9T FYLg0dKlr6HR4v1fVhDh9PkwR7zr2YGjdx/6rJcP1ojI5nWzmH04k4/JknO7xRnl+40C 6VspNi1b0JTXMB9vTykbCHfK34lGBRVLGHVJcRtF4GzLDXSssb24aYTZIBTnbQNfFmB1 YUlXZ+J7adef0x6lLHrCnEHssikkhYYmKi7tpGV1/hEA4j+6O7WqClThzQixT52kg65b V6Jw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533COCRzq6DX387fOiBb5Ibt2hbGeQWyEXCa4nkM6LdQPMAot5T4 qo30VgAHJL9WGM6DxMpR+19Y29b3BIc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLsVN13lqU2iUvf+WnPiK6ZUnz+vlHgQthZnh1/l4r/GOlRuPxrD1JWNCb4oAKgvj46zoG7w==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:ff43:: with SMTP id s3mr3214098pgk.623.1644436549095; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:55:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1180:7001:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1180:7001:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id nv13sm7035613pjb.18.2022.02.09.11.55.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 11:55:48 -0800 (PST)
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, tsv-art@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026.all@ietf.org
References: <164442923749.24453.13117947281136337416@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <65ab4aea-e131-239e-b6af-68702f6f9741@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:55:43 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <164442923749.24453.13117947281136337416@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/zeSYE5FH4xEIHBOSC87ewwB99f0>
Subject: Re: [Tsv-art] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01
X-BeenThere: tsv-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Review Team <tsv-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsv-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsv-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsv-art>, <mailto:tsv-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 19:56:00 -0000

On 10-Feb-22 06:53, Bernard Aboba via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Bernard Aboba
> Review result: Almost Ready
> 
> This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
> ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
> primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
> authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
> discussion list for information.
> 
> When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
> review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
> tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.
> 
> This document updates RFC 2026 so as to be compatible with the proposed
> RFC Editor Model v3.
> 
> This document has no transport-related implications.
> 
> NITs:
> 
> "It no " -> "It is no"
> 
> Given that  [I-D.iab-rfcefdp-rfced-model] provides the justification for the
> change to RFC 2026, it seems like it should be a normative rather than an
> informative reference.

That would be a downref. However, we decided to do exactly what you suggest
in draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter.

      Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email