Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (4569)
<lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> Wed, 06 January 2016 05:42 UTC
Return-Path: <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCE11A9308 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:42:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FKi9_es2UHTR for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:42:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm25-vm4.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm25-vm4.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.97.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366951ABB1A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 21:42:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1452058958; bh=lG9xkvgf8670+mq4ebyzpFLw/1/3azUyy0ctXJVEuvk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=siHFRm5fczzSDqC1WGjpdEN69g/xymIwPs66ysgCAr+KoUJW6xZhRtswuh3kBU6WorERr+9HULROxelueg8YcPe1CVmPjVbre6Yo70ZyykshEXYDCoS/422sdNREoVgFOWNj9xv05Zvo3tw/dJmj0OTVozrxPIBxOSOAMS9jE9ZsuS9HQoLE2XltIn9T16m6V4lQLoZjKO8dyjTRhi8u/bZ9p9cQsGu4kKi70X4BjXFC/rar8PCYkAywmz4Q92cBHcxg10oQdt2gen361g3zRl4G4MqcIM0LTgXwt/TUkN/zIWVKjITBUczyGGpvEsqamI/jYc066wZ+S91VJN+b5w==
Received: from [212.82.98.56] by nm25.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2016 05:42:38 -0000
Received: from [212.82.98.81] by tm9.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2016 05:42:38 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1018.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2016 05:42:38 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 307423.35254.bm@omp1018.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: ZES9wmcVM1l3rRx5gvTTjs9_XQ1h37tjNzu_57KT.2cGt4j5rXyn0azeVz0AkuD ABczlQW.t9e64T6pGKILG1YjOmyTl9wPJrV_XE_WmdDY9SsdLI1RvDswd5e6qBQ4dIut3N.1nGFy jgD2jbZLiSKKvb9QrJvOyQ.Lo5sz.XInmLP_2xvXdwrQ8KcIm9weJn_ezbrnhShtSwMYP9aPYrdn 0OS1.Clpde9gAyYVm4Cp4Ge59O2z3kwYLb_jfZy4s8icu7wwRZ9GnripBwOF6CanS2baKf_kVLnN nPgObROanRItO7ruPqxTAKui8i93Vw9YzC.mYFrjBHJfw8RQmdCryfArT2bP7oStMHXXS9dI34yL 1bQ69X0mRsmsQbn_TGLiVKT2tA.aEViI5BdWjJsj3gJW_z7EHl46OR6N6yewUtx8BoqPYPZEdeis XOCVaR_aPHx9vGSy_HVV31QC9haZNui1076ePJdyU4YT_sGbkKFdRx5QctYlRXsWXWN4neZdNTrj h2M4sDJE1ab4X5_igWc7aye7LKR3OCwZM_Fs-
Received: by 212.82.98.116; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 05:42:37 +0000
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 05:42:18 +0000
From: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
To: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com>
Message-ID: <169720239.2158786.1452058938324.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <B2D07161-9FA7-4125-9369-AAD682AFEA53@amsl.com>
References: <B2D07161-9FA7-4125-9369-AAD682AFEA53@amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/-yvqtbtfha_0l28w61s3RRVLvCY>
Cc: "gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "floyd@icir.org" <floyd@icir.org>, "nmalykh@gmail.com" <nmalykh@gmail.com>, "craig@bbn.com" <craig@bbn.com>, "mls.ietf@gmail.com" <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "mallman@bbn.com" <mallman@bbn.com>, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (4569)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 05:42:42 -0000
Megan, please also raise this as an erratum to the earlier RFC 2414, as allman points out. Credit again to Nikolai. RFC 2414: *** A second set of experiments has explored TCP performance over dialup modem links. In experiments over a 28.8 bps dialup channel [All97a, AHO98],*** there should be *** A second set of experiments has explored TCP performance over dialup modem links. In experiments over a 28.8 kbps dialup channel [All97a, AHO98],*** Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk http://about.me/lloydwood ----- Original Message ----- From: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com> To: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk Cc: mallman@bbn.com; floyd@icir.org; craig@bbn.com; spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com; mls.ietf@gmail.com; gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk; david.black@emc.com; RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>; tsvwg@ietf.org; nmalykh@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, 5 January 2016, 12:05 Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (4569) Lloyd, We believe we have updated as intended. Please review the report as listed at http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3390&eid=4569 and let us know any objections. Thank you. RFC Editor/mf On Dec 22, 2015, at 7:17 PM, lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > Should actually be lower case k kbps (for 1000, not 1024 or Kibps.) > > Lloyd Wood > lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk > http://about.me/lloydwood > > -------------------------------------------- > On Tue, 22/12/15, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > Subject: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (4569) > To: mallman@bbn.com, floyd@icir.org, craig@bbn.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, mls.ietf@gmail.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, david.black@emc.com > Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org, nmalykh@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Date: Tuesday, 22 December, 2015, 21:18 > > The following errata report has been > submitted for RFC3390, > "Increasing TCP's Initial Window". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3390&eid=4569 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@gmail.com> > > Section: 8.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > A second set of experiments explored TCP > performance over dialup > modem links. In experiments over a > 28.8 bps dialup channel [All97a, > AHO98], a four-segment initial window > decreased the transfer time of > a 16KB file by roughly 10%, with no > accompanying increase in the drop > rate. A simulation study [RFC2416] > investigated the effects of using > a larger initial window on a host > connected by a slow modem link and > a router with a 3 packet buffer. The > study concluded that for the > scenario investigated, the use of larger > initial windows was not > harmful to TCP performance. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > A second set of experiments explored TCP > performance over dialup > modem links. In experiments over a > 28.8 Kbps dialup channel [All97a, > AHO98], a four-segment initial window > decreased the transfer time of > a 16KB file by roughly 10%, with no > accompanying increase in the drop > rate. A simulation study [RFC2416] > investigated the effects of using > a larger initial window on a host > connected by a slow modem link and > a router with a 3 packet buffer. The > study concluded that for the > scenario investigated, the use of larger > initial windows was not > harmful to TCP performance. > > Notes > ----- > Error bit rate - bps instead of Kbps. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If > necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if > necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC3390 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-initwin-04) > -------------------------------------- > Title > : Increasing TCP's Initial Window > Publication Date : October 2002 > Author(s) : M. > Allman, S. Floyd, C. Partridge > Category : PROPOSED > STANDARD > Source : > Transport Area Working Group > Area > : Transport > Stream : > IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > >
- [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (4569) RFC Errata System
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… lloyd.wood
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Mark Allman
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Mitchell Erblich
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Mark Allman
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Megan Ferguson
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Craig Partridge
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… lloyd.wood
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Joe Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Joe Touch
- [tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC3390 (4569) RFC Errata System