Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (4569)

Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com> Tue, 05 January 2016 01:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mferguson@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2FC1ACE03 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:05:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hLByKr4MnEMw for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:05:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC601ACE07 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:05:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5894E1E5A34; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:04:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id shGkkauK6XQs; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:04:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.12] (pool-108-48-203-211.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.48.203.211]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4F8DA1E5A32; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <1008031961.4121046.1450829876023.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 20:05:10 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B2D07161-9FA7-4125-9369-AAD682AFEA53@amsl.com>
References: <1008031961.4121046.1450829876023.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1008031961.4121046.1450829876023.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
To: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/npQ-KGOOAIwpis4AWaChs1PpRFc>
Cc: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, floyd@icir.org, nmalykh@gmail.com, craig@bbn.com, mls.ietf@gmail.com, tsvwg@ietf.org, mallman@bbn.com, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (4569)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 01:05:14 -0000

Lloyd,

We believe we have updated as intended.  Please review the report as listed at http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3390&eid=4569 and let us know any objections.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf

On Dec 22, 2015, at 7:17 PM, lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk wrote:

> Should actually be lower case k kbps (for 1000, not 1024 or Kibps.)
> 
> Lloyd Wood
> lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
> http://about.me/lloydwood 
> 
> --------------------------------------------
> On Tue, 22/12/15, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> Subject: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (4569)
> To: mallman@bbn.com, floyd@icir.org, craig@bbn.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, mls.ietf@gmail.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, david.black@emc.com
> Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org, nmalykh@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Date: Tuesday, 22 December, 2015, 21:18
> 
> The following errata report has been
> submitted for RFC3390,
> "Increasing TCP's Initial Window".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3390&eid=4569
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 8.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    A second set of experiments explored TCP
> performance over dialup
>    modem links.  In experiments over a
> 28.8 bps dialup channel [All97a,
>    AHO98], a four-segment initial window
> decreased the transfer time of
>    a 16KB file by roughly 10%, with no
> accompanying increase in the drop
>    rate.  A simulation study [RFC2416]
> investigated the effects of using
>    a larger initial window on a host
> connected by a slow modem link and
>    a router with a 3 packet buffer.  The
> study concluded that for the
>    scenario investigated, the use of larger
> initial windows was not
>    harmful to TCP performance.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    A second set of experiments explored TCP
> performance over dialup
>    modem links.  In experiments over a
> 28.8 Kbps dialup channel [All97a,
>    AHO98], a four-segment initial window
> decreased the transfer time of
>    a 16KB file by roughly 10%, with no
> accompanying increase in the drop
>    rate.  A simulation study [RFC2416]
> investigated the effects of using
>    a larger initial window on a host
> connected by a slow modem link and
>    a router with a 3 packet buffer.  The
> study concluded that for the
>    scenario investigated, the use of larger
> initial windows was not
>    harmful to TCP performance.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Error bit rate - bps instead of Kbps.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If
> necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if
> necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC3390 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-initwin-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title           
>    : Increasing TCP's Initial Window
> Publication Date    : October 2002
> Author(s)           : M.
> Allman, S. Floyd, C. Partridge
> Category            : PROPOSED
> STANDARD
> Source              :
> Transport Area Working Group
> Area               
> : Transport
> Stream              :
> IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
>