Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (4569)
Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com> Tue, 05 January 2016 01:05 UTC
Return-Path: <mferguson@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2FC1ACE03 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:05:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hLByKr4MnEMw for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:05:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC601ACE07 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:05:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5894E1E5A34; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:04:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id shGkkauK6XQs; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:04:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.12] (pool-108-48-203-211.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.48.203.211]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4F8DA1E5A32; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <1008031961.4121046.1450829876023.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 20:05:10 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B2D07161-9FA7-4125-9369-AAD682AFEA53@amsl.com>
References: <1008031961.4121046.1450829876023.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1008031961.4121046.1450829876023.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
To: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/npQ-KGOOAIwpis4AWaChs1PpRFc>
Cc: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, floyd@icir.org, nmalykh@gmail.com, craig@bbn.com, mls.ietf@gmail.com, tsvwg@ietf.org, mallman@bbn.com, RFC System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (4569)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 01:05:14 -0000
Lloyd, We believe we have updated as intended. Please review the report as listed at http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3390&eid=4569 and let us know any objections. Thank you. RFC Editor/mf On Dec 22, 2015, at 7:17 PM, lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > Should actually be lower case k kbps (for 1000, not 1024 or Kibps.) > > Lloyd Wood > lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk > http://about.me/lloydwood > > -------------------------------------------- > On Tue, 22/12/15, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > Subject: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (4569) > To: mallman@bbn.com, floyd@icir.org, craig@bbn.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, mls.ietf@gmail.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, david.black@emc.com > Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org, nmalykh@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Date: Tuesday, 22 December, 2015, 21:18 > > The following errata report has been > submitted for RFC3390, > "Increasing TCP's Initial Window". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3390&eid=4569 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@gmail.com> > > Section: 8.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > A second set of experiments explored TCP > performance over dialup > modem links. In experiments over a > 28.8 bps dialup channel [All97a, > AHO98], a four-segment initial window > decreased the transfer time of > a 16KB file by roughly 10%, with no > accompanying increase in the drop > rate. A simulation study [RFC2416] > investigated the effects of using > a larger initial window on a host > connected by a slow modem link and > a router with a 3 packet buffer. The > study concluded that for the > scenario investigated, the use of larger > initial windows was not > harmful to TCP performance. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > A second set of experiments explored TCP > performance over dialup > modem links. In experiments over a > 28.8 Kbps dialup channel [All97a, > AHO98], a four-segment initial window > decreased the transfer time of > a 16KB file by roughly 10%, with no > accompanying increase in the drop > rate. A simulation study [RFC2416] > investigated the effects of using > a larger initial window on a host > connected by a slow modem link and > a router with a 3 packet buffer. The > study concluded that for the > scenario investigated, the use of larger > initial windows was not > harmful to TCP performance. > > Notes > ----- > Error bit rate - bps instead of Kbps. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If > necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if > necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC3390 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-initwin-04) > -------------------------------------- > Title > : Increasing TCP's Initial Window > Publication Date : October 2002 > Author(s) : M. > Allman, S. Floyd, C. Partridge > Category : PROPOSED > STANDARD > Source : > Transport Area Working Group > Area > : Transport > Stream : > IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > >
- [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (4569) RFC Errata System
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… lloyd.wood
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Mark Allman
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Mitchell Erblich
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Mark Allman
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Megan Ferguson
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Craig Partridge
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… lloyd.wood
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Joe Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3390 (… Joe Touch
- [tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC3390 (4569) RFC Errata System