Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update
Derek Fawcus <dfawcus+lists-tsvwg@employees.org> Mon, 05 November 2018 12:22 UTC
Return-Path: <dfawcus@employees.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7E9130DD3 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 04:22:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9SdH5ZNUHosr for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 04:22:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bugle.employees.org (accordion.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 367F9130E70 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 04:22:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bugle.employees.org (Postfix, from userid 1736) id C35B1FECBE4F; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 12:22:27 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:22:27 +0000
From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus+lists-tsvwg@employees.org>
To: G Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, tsvwg@ietf.org
Cc: "tom@erg.abdn.ac.uk" <tom@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, touch@strayalpha.com
Message-ID: <20181105122227.GA12854@bugle.employees.org>
References: <5BDFE320.9030802@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <20181105063300.GA14271@tom-desk.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181105063300.GA14271@tom-desk.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/2HUBcIoh14qVfTOz3u96VzHxxU8>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:22:35 -0000
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 06:33:00AM +0000, tom@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote: > > At IETF-103 we are presenting the CCO > (draft-fairhurst-udp-options-cco, see maprg and tsvwg second meeting). > We think use of the CCO is required on the internet and an checksum > using the CCO pseudo header should replace the OCS. > > xx 4 Checksum Compensation Option (CCO) - An alternative approach to OCS Oh - I like that. Have you actually observed any middlebox corruption or mis-checking along the lines mentioned? If so, then it would seem this new option would be mandatory to include in all UDP packets containing UDP options. DF
- [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update tom@erg.abdn.ac.uk
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Derek Fawcus
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Joe Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Tom Herbert
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Joe Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Joe Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Derek Fawcus
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Joe Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Tom Herbert
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Joe Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Joe Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Tom Herbert
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Joe Touch
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Derek Fawcus
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [tsvwg] UDP Options Implementation Update tom@erg.abdn.ac.uk