[tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6056 (7873)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 27 March 2024 16:09 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC86DC14F6E2; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.656
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.656 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TWC1H7JIWWwW; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE5E5C14F6B4; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id AA020AFB75; Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: michael.larsen@tieto.com, fernando@gont.com.ar, tsvwg-ads@ietf.org, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, martenseemann@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: stepnem@smrk.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240327160955.AA020AFB75@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:09:55 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/2vqRbky7TxBZ3Js30GUc_gla-iM>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6056 (7873)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 16:09:59 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6056, "Recommendations for Transport-Protocol Port Randomization". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7873 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Štěpán Němec <stepnem@smrk.net> Section: 3.3.3 Original Text ------------- (this "separation of the ephemeral port space" means that transport-protocol instances with different remote endpoints will not have different sequences of port numbers, i.e., will not be part of the same ephemeral port sequence as in the case of the traditional BSD ephemeral port selection algorithm) Corrected Text -------------- (this "separation of the ephemeral port space" means that transport-protocol instances with different remote endpoints will have different sequences of port numbers, i.e., will not be part of the same ephemeral port sequence as in the case of the traditional BSD ephemeral port selection algorithm) Notes ----- Drop the first "not", otherwise the two parts of the sentence (before and after "i.e.") are contradictory and the whole parenthetical doesn't match the context. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6056 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Recommendations for Transport-Protocol Port Randomization Publication Date : January 2011 Author(s) : M. Larsen, F. Gont Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE Source : Transport and Services Working Group Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6056 (7873) RFC Errata System