IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsvwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpthreat-01 starts NOW

Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Sun, 15 October 2006 12:09 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZ4nz-0001fP-Ms; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:09:23 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZ4ny-0001fK-Rk for tsvwg@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:09:22 -0400
Received: from mail-n.franken.de ([193.175.24.27] helo=ilsa.franken.de) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZ4nx-0003Yx-De for tsvwg@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:09:22 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (p5481E09D.dip.t-dialin.net [84.129.224.157]) by ilsa.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01790245C4; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:09:15 +0200 (CEST) (KNF account authenticated via SMTP-AUTH)
In-Reply-To: <20061015050239.A25673@openss7.org>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20061015030131.036c68a0@email.cisco.com> <20061015050239.A25673@openss7.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <774DE8F4-9E4D-4B7E-A55C-8D46136ED1AB@lurchi.franken.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpthreat-01 starts NOW
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:09:15 +0200
To: bidulock@openss7.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Cc: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Brian,

the document covers all known attacks and counter measures against
SCTP (base protocol) and extensions like ADD-IP. So it does not fit
well as an Security Section in 2960bis.

I think it is a good idea to have it as a separate document.

Best regards
Michael

On Oct 15, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:

> Annother comment (well, questions) on this:  This draft looks like it
> should be the security section of the other draft at WGLC:  
> 2960bis.  Why
> is not this entire draft imported into the security section of  
> 2960bis?
> As as a separate INFO RFC, it will leave the DS security section  
> lacking.
> Or was it the intention to have 2960bis refer to this info RFC from  
> its
> security section?
>
> --brian
>
> -- 
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> bidulock@openss7.org
> http://www.openss7.org/
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email