IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tsvwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpthreat-01 starts NOW

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org> Sun, 15 October 2006 14:11 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZ6hk-0002Zu-Cx; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:11:04 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZ6hi-0002Zp-Hr for tsvwg@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:11:02 -0400
Received: from gw.openss7.com ([142.179.199.224]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GZ6hh-0002jw-4J for tsvwg@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:11:02 -0400
Received: from ns.pigworks.openss7.net (IDENT:PFZvCPCsZc4hL3S/R0GLRvcLd7UYKDFq@ns1.evil.openss7.net [192.168.9.1]) by gw.openss7.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k9FEAwD03854; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:10:58 -0600
Received: (from brian@localhost) by ns.pigworks.openss7.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id k9FEAw530772; Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:10:58 -0600
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 08:10:58 -0600
From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>
To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpthreat-01 starts NOW
Message-ID: <20061015081057.A30180@openss7.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20061015030131.036c68a0@email.cisco.com> <20061015050239.A25673@openss7.org> <774DE8F4-9E4D-4B7E-A55C-8D46136ED1AB@lurchi.franken.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <774DE8F4-9E4D-4B7E-A55C-8D46136ED1AB@lurchi.franken.de>; from Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de on Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:09:15PM +0200
Organization: http://www.openss7.org/
Dsn-Notification-To: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336
Cc: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bidulock@openss7.org
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org

Michael,

Funny you should mention ADD-IP.  That is another document the draft
mentions in several places without referencing.

Do we publish RFCs containing threats to drafts?

--brian

Michael Tuexen wrote:                           (Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:09:15)
> Hi Brian,
> 
> the document covers all known attacks and counter measures against
> SCTP (base protocol) and extensions like ADD-IP. So it does not fit
> well as an Security Section in 2960bis.
> 
> I think it is a good idea to have it as a separate document.
> 
> Best regards
> Michael
> 
> On Oct 15, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> 
> > Annother comment (well, questions) on this:  This draft looks like it
> > should be the security section of the other draft at WGLC:  
> > 2960bis.  Why
> > is not this entire draft imported into the security section of  
> > 2960bis?
> > As as a separate INFO RFC, it will leave the DS security section  
> > lacking.
> > Or was it the intention to have 2960bis refer to this info RFC from  
> > its
> > security section?
> >
> > --brian
> >
> > -- 
> > Brian F. G. Bidulock
> > bidulock@openss7.org
> > http://www.openss7.org/
> >
> >

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
bidulock@openss7.org
http://www.openss7.org/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email