IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-henry-tsvwg-diffserv-to-qci-00.txt

"Jerome Henry (jerhenry)" <jerhenry@cisco.com> Mon, 29 October 2018 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jerhenry@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FCF12D4F0; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X9mf0OVEF2rP; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 082B51292F1; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1270; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1540829386; x=1542038986; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=+MRcXKatRSVPMHnmsrso8eN5XQqHifER1HSIxBOvCG8=; b=P8fsvrSbAToXAaGp7c7Im8TBDCUIZlfjbc9G/Xxxq63MDJkfkVYC8paC De3oE17Syf8f8PjvCkwQrKz+HLNkrCkzZBfIX6MsOpMUWPn9TnaLn/Mhu noM4rFzLuml1uXAD+ObasOe5kdE9vGvx/W985p35zx9T6rkqb1B/QTTVc 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AEAAB+MNdb/4sNJK1kGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBWipmfygKg2uIGIwXiw2OIIF6CwEBJYRHAheDFiE0DQ0BAwEBAgEBAm0cDIU7BiMRRRACAQgaAiYCAgIfERUQAgQOBRqDBwGBaQMVD6hFgS6Hbw2CEwWBC4pcF4FBP4E4H4FOfoJWRQEBAgGBXoMEMYImAp5bLgkChmiGc4MnGJBHjHB/iQYCERSBJh04gVVwFWUBgkGDOgEHh1eFPm8BAYwEgR8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,440,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="192686782"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Oct 2018 16:09:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com (xch-rcd-018.cisco.com [173.37.102.28]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9TG9iHc022792 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:09:44 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-020.cisco.com (173.37.102.30) by XCH-RCD-018.cisco.com (173.37.102.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:09:43 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-020.cisco.com ([173.37.102.30]) by XCH-RCD-020.cisco.com ([173.37.102.30]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 11:09:43 -0500
From: "Jerome Henry (jerhenry)" <jerhenry@cisco.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
CC: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "draft-henry-tsvwg-diffserv-to-qci@ietf.org" <draft-henry-tsvwg-diffserv-to-qci@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-henry-tsvwg-diffserv-to-qci-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUbyWCM+dT3CawbEazWbyktdES5qU2dhOA
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:09:43 +0000
Message-ID: <34D4E941-B88A-4B39-86B5-CE9EA8BB14CB@cisco.com>
References: <153971927528.9352.418104757398396031@ietfa.amsl.com> <184d1317-b08c-9f0b-dc08-44d92f3fa2bd@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <184d1317-b08c-9f0b-dc08-44d92f3fa2bd@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.65.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <28FFD76101AB1B41A2BBCAC62D61B4ED@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.28, xch-rcd-018.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/4hUYU6vfaTwm1eIIxotpy4cKatU>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-henry-tsvwg-diffserv-to-qci-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 16:09:48 -0000

Thank you Brian,

We'll make that correction in the next iteration of the draft, great to hear the news!

Best,

Jerome 

On 10/28/18, 9:19 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi,
    
    In https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-henry-tsvwg-diffserv-to-qci-00#section-4.2.10
    we find:
    
    >    ...recommend Low-Priority Data be marked CS1 DSCP.
    > 
    >    Note: This marking recommendation may change in the future, as [LE-
    >    PHB] defines a Lower Effort (LE) PHB for Low-Priority Data traffic
    >    and recommends an additional DSCP for this traffic.
    
    It seems to me that [LE-PHB] has advanced to the point where this recommendation
    should be the other way round: recommend the new LE codepoint, with a note
    that historically the CS1 codepoint has been (mis)used for this purpose.
    
    Regards
       Brian Carpenter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email