Re: wglc FOR draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-09 started

[Randy Stewart <[e-mail]>]

Tom:

I held off adding your comments.. which I plan on doing
as part of WGLC comments....

Spinning the document endlessly over and over (I had already
spinned it once).. with a few changes did not seem the right
course.. instead I would like to collect all comments and do
one more spin.

And you are of course always welcome to send suggested text in
your comments ;-)

R
On Feb 8, 2011, at 5:41 AM, t.petch wrote:

> I last posted a comment on this 15th january, part of an
> ongoing, for several months, discussion about race 
> conditions.  Given the seeming difficulty in getting this
> right, I do not think this I-D yet ready to progress (ie
> until this is resolved, I don't want to know what other
> problems I have with it:-)
> 
> Tom Petch
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "James M. Polk" <[e-mail]>
> To: "tsvwg" <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 4:07 AM
> Subject: wglc FOR draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-09 started
> 
> 
>> TSVWG
>> 
>> I am starting the WGLC for
>> 
>> "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Stream Reconfiguration"
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst/
>> 
>> this is a 2 week WGLC, ending February 22nd, 2011 or when the chairs 
>> feel the WG has reviewed the draft and reached consensus to progress 
>> towards the ADs with the goal of becoming a proposed standard (PS) RFC.
>> 
>> The chairs require substantive feedback from the WG regarding this 
>> draft before consensus can be called.
>> 
>> I will be the document shepherd.
>> 
>> James
>> TSVWG chair
>> 
> 

-----
Randall Stewart
[e-mail]