IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: wglc FOR draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-09 started

"t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 08 February 2011 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894553A7120 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 03:45:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, SARE_SUB_6CONS_WORD=0.356]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CX9kmNJlnAt3 for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 03:45:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.btconnect.com (c2bthomr10.btconnect.com [213.123.20.128]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663C93A711D for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 03:45:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from host86-156-136-65.range86-156.btcentralplus.com (HELO pc6) ([86.156.136.65]) by c2bthomr10.btconnect.com with SMTP id BRB88452; Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:45:55 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <019c01cbc77c$cf119820$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
References: <201102080311.p183BpvU025288@sj-core-2.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: wglc FOR draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-09 started
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:41:38 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Neutral-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0302.4D512CE6.01E8, actions=tag
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr10.btconnect.com
X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0203.4D512CF6.0267, ss=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:45:54 -0000

I last posted a comment on this 15th january, part of an
ongoing, for several months, discussion about race 
conditions.  Given the seeming difficulty in getting this
right, I do not think this I-D yet ready to progress (ie
until this is resolved, I don't want to know what other
problems I have with it:-)

Tom Petch

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
To: "tsvwg" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 4:07 AM
Subject: wglc FOR draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst-09 started


> TSVWG
> 
> I am starting the WGLC for
> 
> "Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Stream Reconfiguration"
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst/
> 
> this is a 2 week WGLC, ending February 22nd, 2011 or when the chairs 
> feel the WG has reviewed the draft and reached consensus to progress 
> towards the ADs with the goal of becoming a proposed standard (PS) RFC.
> 
> The chairs require substantive feedback from the WG regarding this 
> draft before consensus can be called.
> 
> I will be the document shepherd.
> 
> James
> TSVWG chair
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email