Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG DRAFT STATUS October 2012

["Jose Saldana" <[e-mail]>]

Hello.

Regarding draft-saldana-tsvwg-tcmtf, the question is that there is a
specific mailing list ([e-mail]), and we are currently discussing
about it there. One of the topics of the discussion is if a Working Group
should be created for it. This is the reason why it does not appear in your
mail, isn't it?

Thank you very much,

Jose

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] En nombre de
> [e-mail]
> Enviado el: viernes, 19 de octubre de 2012 12:10
> Para: [e-mail]
> Asunto: [tsvwg] TSVWG DRAFT STATUS October 2012
> 
> The list below shows the status of the working group documents as we see
> it. Please check below and comment on drafts using the list. **PLEASE** do
> send any corrections/omissions to the chairs.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> James, Rolf and Gorry
> (TSVWG Chairs)
> 
> ---
> Recently published:
> 
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying was published as RFC 6411.
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctpsocket was published as RFC 6458.
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-strrst was published as RFC 6535.
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-source-quench was published as RFC 6633.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> IDs in RFC Editor Queue:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html
> None.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> IDs in IESG processing:
> None.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> NOTE:
> ITU-T Study Group 12 - TSVWG needs to respond to the ITU-T Liaison on QoS
> Classes & markings for interconnection
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> WG Drafts with Chairs:
> 
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encap
> (Replaced: draft-tuexen-sctp-udp-encap)
> Lars sent a note as AD agreeing to progress this work.
> Work was coordinated with DCCP work on encaps.
> draft-tuexen-sctp-udp-encaps-06, January 10, 2011 Adopted as a work item
> 21 Sept 2011 (Gorry) WG -02 8 Dec 2011 WGLC completed Friday 20th April
> 2012, many discussion and notes that there were implementations.
> 13th Oct 2012, comments sent on draft to prepare for submission.
> DUE: Revised ID needed prior to AD submission, changes agreed.
> 
> ---
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-byte-pkt-congest
> New editor added Jul 2010.
> New revision 25 Oct 2010.
> WG -01, June 10, 2011
> IETF-81: discussed whether this should be BCP.
> ADs & Chairs agree to progress as a BCP
> Status changed to BCP (new-ID WG -05)
> Presented at IETF-82 (Taipei), request for WGLC.
> Gorry added as Shepherd (Jan 2012), Wes added as responsible AD (Jun
> 2012).
> WGLC concluded with comments on I-D, Friday 30th March 2012.
> Draft version of write-up sent to list, comments received.
> - Gorry working with authors to clear list of WGLC questions (5 sept 2012)
> DUE: WG Chair waiting for version that includes additional feedback during
> WGLC
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> WG Drafts:
> 
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn
> Previous version : draft-karagiannis-pcn-tsvwg-rsvp-pcn
> WG interest in this topic recorded at IETF-81.
> Individual -01, 2011-07-11
> AD decision allowed this to be added to the milestones The document was
> adopted, status will be EXP (IETF-84 due to dependencies on PCN RFCs) WG -
> 00 8 Oct 2011
> DUE: Please comment on RVSP aspects (RSVP-DIR review requested 13th Oct
> 2012)
> 
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp-tsvwg
> (Replaced: draft-stewart-natsupp-tsvwg)
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-natsupp/
> Dependency from BEHAVE WG.
> Adopted as a work item 21 Sept 2010 (Gorry).
> WG -00, 29/11/2010
> Uploaded as: draft-ietf-natsupp-tsvwg
> WG -01, June 1, 2011
> Authors restructured draft (-03)
> DUE: Discussion needed on list.
> 
> draft-nishida-tsvwg-sctp-failover
> Individual-00 Presented in Prague, IETF-80.
> - understood not to conflict with draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-multipath
> - PF has been coded into FreeBSD
> DUE: WG adoption being considered - please comment to list 26/6/2012.
> Adopted by WG
> DUE: Please comment on list.
> 
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec
> WG interest in this topic recorded at IETF-78.
> Charter update would be needed to progress this work.
> 5 Reviews needed to determine energy/technical direction.
> WG -05 (presented in Beijing, IETF-79)
> WG -06 (presented in Prague, IETF-80)
> RSVP directorate was consulted.
> 2 reviews from RSVP-DIR received (Bruce Davie, ?)
> 2 additional reviews promised (Ken Carlberg, Francois LeF) Chairs asked AD
> for a Charter update (IESG agreed) Draft discussed at IETF-80, and request
to
> update charter agreed
> - AD advised 4 named reviewers will be required Adopted for progression as
> PS, for May 2012
> - New approach presented following WG comments
> DUE: Discussion needed on list.
> 
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-00
> (replaces draft-touch-tsvwg-port-use-00)
> - Intended to be advice to protocol designers needing a port.
> 5 people have looked at this document, Prague IETF-80 Individual -01 July
> 2011
> IETF-81 insufficient feedback from WG at this time.
> WG needs to assess if the new draft should be a work item.
> IETF-82, discussed - Chairs will ask WG to consider.
> Adopted by WG
> DUE: Revised ID expected to complete missing sections
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> WG action required:
> 
> draft-polk-tsvwg-rsvp-app-id-vv-profiles
> -01 Presented in Beijing, IETF-79.
> -02, 14-Mar-2011
> Presented IET-80.
> WG needs to assess if the new draft should be a work item.
> Seek to coordinate with music with partner ID:
> draft-polk-mmusic-traffic-class-for-sdp
> Author requests to make a WG work item...
> Gorry liaised with MMUSIC WG Chairs on companion draft, intended for LC
> early 2013.
> Gorry - not much discussion on this list, please assess as a candidate
working
> document.
> DUE: ***PLEASE*** comment on list.
> 
> draft-polk-tsvwg-rfc4594-update
> - noted at IETF-84, but not discussed (no time).
> draft-polk-tsvwg-new-dscp-assignments
> - noted at IETF-84, but not discussed (no time).
> WG action required (Transport Protocols):
> 
> draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-multipath
> -00 Presented in Prague, IETF-80.
> - understood not to conflict with draft-nishida-tsvwg-sctp-failover -01,
2010-
> 12-27
> DUE: Please comment to list.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The following have received recent discussion at TSVWG meetings or on the
> list. Inclusion in the list below does not indicate support for these
specific
> drafts and other contributions are also warmly welcomed.
> 
> draft-carlberg-tsvwg-ecn-reactions
> Reactions to Signaling from ECN Support for RTP/RTCP
> -00 presented IETF-82
> Not yet requested to become a work item.
> - This draft is related to the new rmcat work.
> DUE: Please comment on list.
> 
> draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately
> -05, 2011-01-02
> - Aug 2011, discussed on list and issues raised.
> DUE: Chairs need to confirm adoption (need to do work).
> DUE: New revision need (to address comments) Please comment on list.
> 
> draft-stewart-tsvwg-sctpecn-02
> Partially replaces (draft-stewart-tsvwg-sctp-nonce)
> IETF-78 suggested there was interest in this topic.
> Discussed at IETF-83, Paris.
> DUE: ECN is within the TSVWG Charter,
> will call for adoption on the list.
> DUE: Please comment on list.
> 
> draft-polk-tsvwg-rfc4594-update-00
> Discussed at IETF-83, Paris
> DUE: A Revised ID is needed.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Related non-TSVWG items:
> 
> draft-ietf-behave-sctpnat-03.txt
> BEHAVE WG item linked to SCTP encapsulation work.
> 
> draft-ietf-6man-udpzero
> Previously: draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-6man-udpzero
> Draft was adopted by 6man, please discuss on the 6man list.
> A WGLC of this draft is expected in 6MAN WG.
> Related draft: draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-00 This draft was also LC'ed
in
> TSVWG (end 3rd May 2012)
> 
> draft-ohanlon-rmcat-dflow
> Discussed at IETF-84, Vancouver
> This draft is related to the new rmcat work.
> In IESG discussion on making this a PS for UDP tunnels using IPv6
> DUE: Revised ID needed
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Other news:
> 
> RSVP Directorate (formed in May 2010)
> Charter updated Aug 2011.
> New co-chair: Rolf Winter <[e-mail]>
> 
> ITU-T Study Group 12 Liaison on QoS Classes & markings for interconnection