IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG working group :: detailed status update on work items

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 03 June 2016 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED6312D534 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FSO5hmWW_zcH for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B071212D5A6 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2095; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464973253; x=1466182853; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=gTmmSJzQsBjgGhrRb8JGSPy2HtbWdTRXjzQcvT/NumU=; b=mkRDGPFcVmZSDSiG6DnSQUbGBPUlddBhS/AxZTpQNQLD8uyHt81qhIZ7 1t/lCyJ6r+3Lpo4E9Vv6U27dJ03Z+yKauEGYoDGf/d0icoAvRT2gyrjPD G2rVTASp8MxnWix/VPVcR2VR3fo057gVQd6Pu10jxksrY0O8A+bu9J3z2 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A0BQAnt1FX/49dJa1cDoMsgVMGuEmECIYSAoE3OxEBAQEBAQEBZRwLhEUBAQEDAR1cBQsCAQgYLjIlAgQOBQ6IGQjCZwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQ4OiB4Igk6HbIIuBZhFAYMsgWmJDoFphE+IZIY2iRsBNCCDMztuiRN/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,413,1459814400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="111292403"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Jun 2016 17:00:52 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com (xch-rcd-014.cisco.com [173.37.102.24]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u53H0qsT016231 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:00:52 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) by XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com (173.37.102.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:00:52 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:00:52 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] TSVWG working group :: detailed status update on work items
Thread-Index: AQHRvbl8Gfq3/1Zg6UyT9q5ou+JcwA==
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 17:00:52 +0000
Message-ID: <D67ADEC6-B648-4707-8710-CC6E231F4360@cisco.com>
References: <573D9B0D.2020307@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <573D9B0D.2020307@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.115]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_011E94C3-3D7A-48C4-9C87-B9B3045B4D14"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/7is8k9r83lTfC5pf8G8X--t_QmM>
Cc: tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG working group :: detailed status update on work items
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 17:00:57 -0000

> On May 19, 2016, at 3:53 AM, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Drafts under consideration by WG for adoption:
> ---
> draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11  - Document Shepherd: TBD
> Mapping to 802.11
> - Initial presentation at Prague IETF (Summer 2014)
> - Presentation at IETF Nov 2015.
> Thought to fall within TSVWG charter
> -  No call issued for adoption at this time.
> Chair Note: Does this need to reference RC4594 or an update to that spec.?
> There's some background work that's likely to surface as proposed 4594bis and 5127bis drafts.
> DUE: Please discuss on the TSVWG list.
> DUE: Working Group call for adoption.

What is the current status? We have not observed an adoption call, or received any reviews.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email