IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG working group :: detailed status update on work items

"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Fri, 03 June 2016 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FCD12D74B for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.728
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.728 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=emc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eO0pkbJ89feP for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailuogwdur.emc.com (mailuogwdur.emc.com [128.221.224.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F0A312D746 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 10:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maildlpprd51.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd51.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.155]) by mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id u53HC9MT027119 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:12:11 -0400
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com u53HC9MT027119
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1464973931; bh=J3u01AuVwD5qi5yeyz1FJWD+Gzk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=FuVvJwqJKYUbQKiuO1g3UamVtJd2MUgRIx2P3a4FCfcy99HbRyBlUmsoVyRIDYolU p7EtsaDosNnqKw6sE8++zk4YaekpeB5zSnxWt9nkvW8Jp5cDVO7nsWuhkl5QVPejov 8T+oUtkKgKLEw4wdLx+XvQO7efYaXvNIu8yo1LX4=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd53.lss.emc.com u53HC9MT027119
Received: from mailusrhubprd54.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd54.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.19]) by maildlpprd51.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:11:25 -0400
Received: from MXHUB318.corp.emc.com (MXHUB318.corp.emc.com [10.146.3.96]) by mailusrhubprd54.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id u53HBnX8029747 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:11:49 -0400
Received: from MX307CL04.corp.emc.com ([fe80::849f:5da2:11b:4385]) by MXHUB318.corp.emc.com ([10.146.3.96]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 13:11:48 -0400
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, "gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] TSVWG working group :: detailed status update on work items
Thread-Index: AQHRsbymYkpqHFmoKEqC+RfUEKLBgp/YUo0A//+/tZA=
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 17:11:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F56B653@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
References: <573D9B0D.2020307@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <D67ADEC6-B648-4707-8710-CC6E231F4360@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D67ADEC6-B648-4707-8710-CC6E231F4360@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.238.45.64]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd54.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/coPMpo2zGjCmAm-tjX4H8NALvOw>
Cc: tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG working group :: detailed status update on work items
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 17:12:18 -0000

WG adoption call coming soon ...

Thanks, --David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tsvwg [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker (fred)
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 1:01 PM
> To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
> Cc: tsvwg WG
> Subject: Re: [tsvwg] TSVWG working group :: detailed status update on work
> items
> 
> 
> > On May 19, 2016, at 3:53 AM, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Drafts under consideration by WG for adoption:
> > ---
> > draft-szigeti-tsvwg-ieee-802-11  - Document Shepherd: TBD
> > Mapping to 802.11
> > - Initial presentation at Prague IETF (Summer 2014)
> > - Presentation at IETF Nov 2015.
> > Thought to fall within TSVWG charter
> > -  No call issued for adoption at this time.
> > Chair Note: Does this need to reference RC4594 or an update to that spec.?
> > There's some background work that's likely to surface as proposed 4594bis and
> 5127bis drafts.
> > DUE: Please discuss on the TSVWG list.
> > DUE: Working Group call for adoption.
> 
> What is the current status? We have not observed an adoption call, or received
> any reviews.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email