IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 15 June 2021 00:01 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615623A1474 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pj-DJxjDmLRZ for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A7EE3A146B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id o88-20020a17090a0a61b029016eeb2adf66so455480pjo.4 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XFWKXJ7oWW9IPvQRScjcskZVOf2PDzyLm6pfHHQPtD8=; b=TZDn3E68PXftzW4lwJvBpYtJPq0u8TR04QrpRkkY3k71I65O96AzCTSY1gTQOmu+vt WnaT+b4D885RE4HyWrP26h3ygst1BCANWzmgnDutvlUW6z61XSSUooud3oKBiQscWUxM 2f+mE7QNd1mb7b3YNQJiJkho408cGRxr7VxMsoSnLWX7lGK2IPnuFH1LloQYm8VsfevU u47LRiycmvKSkOs8EzlHn5fvpnTn+NsYRUXWN3FvK0MvgMJJKva968PTV0GQ7lMJ2kC9 TjfZfx9d6xOu2ZN6wq3tCfGSh8XfHw6cuWZsstyA2RsPfk/agXEZQ/V2nh4DqrjcCJ32 3FLA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XFWKXJ7oWW9IPvQRScjcskZVOf2PDzyLm6pfHHQPtD8=; b=uLvOC5nrFGiU+51KeggRTmYFHvnd+LFpJj86Esk/JF8Ho79r52B8KPtZ1gnYqcyUsd Ejy9mykO2YkKxW5HZCIIwoqpln0eevFuOQtm95MZ7qP3VLlJitcACGao6fSGGvR0236z GIX1A6lMmbHTRi4Z5zPGk04oG62AfwRMd4XcNXm1cfB0XhOaXA+DA783wDvEPEn8LElZ nvhQX4RTE4Rvs2mp5YStCjlC1wYDaKakIUGrDUnDTpMaH1YZb8jLJN4YOgGg0J0mPGJk dzr3ACC8oMg8Y7FJkKRhxzTlzxMFlPYOV+Pb6qOvAaLpY3hY5wPatuH3H7xlqYEQQHSi 8nhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532EiN1/Wco6Y6x5nnRFxlDT861Iw+xxD/Lg6UQ+tcOARJsYAkXd j9SuXPZH2d9T1RSdpXViopUyUe/iR2kyRg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNIGI6H3kgy/cYfFvNvdJoEbwRcGd+CzFbq9rAgUrMs9b6WunrrLEdL52RVApNam2Sn1oH2g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9411:: with SMTP id r17mr21578148pjo.49.1623715297934; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:100d:901:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:100d:901:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h186sm13516791pfe.4.2021.06.14.17.01.36 for <tsvwg@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
References: <162367666062.21847.17688805942949440784@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d967aa0d-1120-75d5-0099-b2d7ac15046e@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:01:32 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <162367666062.21847.17688805942949440784@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/BKIN0Nh0gdwDA3U9ElGSoO42b40>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 00:01:43 -0000

> XXX Note: Is it possible to assign a DSCP without defining a new PHB?

Under RFC2474, a RECOMMENDED DSCP requires Standards Action. Also, "Each standardized PHB MUST have an associated RECOMMENDED codepoint". Since standardizing a PHB is the only standards action mentioned in RFC2474, it seems to me that the answer to your question was undoubtedly intended to be "No".

Regards
   Brian

On 15-Jun-21 01:17, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> 
> 
>         Title           : Considerations for Assigning a new Recommended DiffServ Codepoint (DSCP)
>         Authors         : Ana Custura
>                           Godred Fairhurst
>                           Raffaello Secchi
> 	Filename        : draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 19
> 	Date            : 2021-06-14
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document discusses considerations for assigning a new
>    recommended DiffServ Code Point (DSCP).  It considers the common
>    remarking behaviours that the Diffserv field might be subjected to
>    along an Internet path.  It also notes some implications of using a
>    specific DSCP.
> 
>    This individual draft aims to seek comments and contributions from
>    the TSVWG working group.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations/
> 
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email