Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02.txt

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Tue, 15 June 2021 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1303A29C4 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 03:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rpCJyUsdQjqJ for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 03:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2B43A29C3 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 03:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GF-MBP-2.lan (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 523BF1B0025B; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:08:35 +0100 (BST)
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, tsvwg@ietf.org
References: <162367666062.21847.17688805942949440784@ietfa.amsl.com> <d967aa0d-1120-75d5-0099-b2d7ac15046e@gmail.com>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <3c10f325-f2c7-5ce1-f69e-72bf9a880a6c@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 11:08:34 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d967aa0d-1120-75d5-0099-b2d7ac15046e@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/XXsrJ7MZLZth7ol2_omnRidKz_s>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:08:47 -0000

On 15/06/2021 01:01, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> XXX Note: Is it possible to assign a DSCP without defining a new PHB?
> Under RFC2474, a RECOMMENDED DSCP requires Standards Action. Also, "Each standardized PHB MUST have an associated RECOMMENDED codepoint". Since standardizing a PHB is the only standards action mentioned in RFC2474, it seems to me that the answer to your question was undoubtedly intended to be "No".
>
> Regards
>     Brian

I'd be pleased for the ID to say that in the next revision!

Gorry

> On 15-Jun-21 01:17, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>
>>
>>          Title           : Considerations for Assigning a new Recommended DiffServ Codepoint (DSCP)
>>          Authors         : Ana Custura
>>                            Godred Fairhurst
>>                            Raffaello Secchi
>> 	Filename        : draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02.txt
>> 	Pages           : 19
>> 	Date            : 2021-06-14
>>
>> Abstract:
>>     This document discusses considerations for assigning a new
>>     recommended DiffServ Code Point (DSCP).  It considers the common
>>     remarking behaviours that the Diffserv field might be subjected to
>>     along an Internet path.  It also notes some implications of using a
>>     specific DSCP.
>>
>>     This individual draft aims to seek comments and contributions from
>>     the TSVWG working group.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations/
>>
>> There is also an htmlized version available at:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-custura-tsvwg-dscp-considerations-02
>>
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>>