[tsvwg] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08.txt

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Mon, 26 August 2019 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D10120C60 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQzhRnfW5hi1 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4BD1200FF for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MacBook-Pro-5.local (fgrpf.plus.com []) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD5E01B001BF for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:52:34 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <5D642A72.2080402@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:52:34 +0100
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Reply-To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Organization: University of Aberdeen
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org"
References: <156684258740.30637.2528083418817942864@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156684258740.30637.2528083418817942864@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <156684258740.30637.2528083418817942864@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/C9Ya8dW2Cz-kKDZTFIL-WmBdtMI>
Subject: [tsvwg] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 18:52:41 -0000

In this revision we addressed feedback received and completed some 
editorial work, including
updating the text referring to RFC7872, in preparation for a WGLC.

Best wishes,

Gorry&  Colin

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08.txt
Date: 	Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:03:07 -0700
From: 	internet-drafts@ietf.org
Reply-To: 	tsvwg@ietf.org
To: 	<i-d-announce@ietf.org>
CC: 	tsvwg@ietf.org

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Transport Area Working Group WG of the IETF.

         Title           : The Impact of Transport Header Confidentiality on Network Operation and Evolution of the Internet
         Authors         : Godred Fairhurst
                           Colin Perkins
	Filename        : draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08.txt
	Pages           : 45
	Date            : 2019-08-26

    This document describes some implications of applying end-to-end
    encryption at the transport layer.  It first identifies in-network
    uses of transport layer header information.  Then, it reviews some
    implications of developing end-to-end transport protocols that use
    encryption to provide confidentiality of the transport protocol
    headers, or that use authentication to protect the integrity of
    transport header information.  Since measurement and analysis of the
    impact of network characteristics on transport protocols has been
    important to the design of current transports, it also considers the
    impact of transport encryption on transport and application

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There are also htmlized versions available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: