Re: AD review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-chunk-flags-01
Michael Tüxen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Thu, 23 September 2010 08:45 UTC
Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8D23A6AAD for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 01:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.554, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_DIP_TDIAL=2.144, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GtbnzPXXnd3E for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 01:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A433A69C2 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 01:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.190] (p5481B320.dip.t-dialin.net [84.129.179.32]) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB1E1C0C0BCE; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:45:49 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: AD review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-chunk-flags-01
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Michael Tüxen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <9B6A20F6-ABE4-4BEA-9B8E-2E97113E5FEF@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:45:48 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <606E635C-60A0-484C-978D-8FA73A549B8E@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <9B6A20F6-ABE4-4BEA-9B8E-2E97113E5FEF@nokia.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:45:22 -0000
On Sep 23, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Lars Eggert wrote: > Summary: ready for IETF last call > > Please fix the nits below in your working copy: Hi Lars, fixed in CVS. Will be included in the next revision. Thanks for reporting them. Best regards Michael > > Section 1., paragraph 2: >> registry entries for for existing chunk types. The protocol is not > > Nit: s/for for/for/ > > > Section 3.3., paragraph 1: >> to use these value to create the new registry. > > Nit: s/these value/these values/ >
- AD review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-chunk-flags-01 Lars Eggert
- Re: AD review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-chunk-flags-… Michael Tüxen