Re: [tsvwg] ECN experimentation draft - support adoption
"De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE)" <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com> Fri, 09 December 2016 09:03 UTC
Return-Path: <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4D412A270 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 01:03:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YTaTjG5wNQzz for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 01:03:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF7912A271 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 01:03:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.45]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id E0E3B399BE630; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 09:03:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id uB993SSa017818 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 09:03:34 GMT
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id uB993GiO026479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 9 Dec 2016 09:03:25 GMT
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.65]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 10:02:46 +0100
From: "De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE)" <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com>
To: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: ECN experimentation draft - support adoption
Thread-Index: AdJLRO+JXIUhGyF3Tr2t1h4o+ofvRQGtXfLA
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 09:02:46 +0000
Message-ID: <BF6B00CC65FD2D45A326E74492B2C19FB77E280B@FR711WXCHMBA05.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F775181@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362F775181@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/DyN_7TGQZNLo1tggaoFCrwAQqVE>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] ECN experimentation draft - support adoption
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 09:03:38 -0000
I support adoption. Koen. > -----Original Message----- > From: tsvwg [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black, David > Sent: woensdag 30 november 2016 21:04 > To: tsvwg@ietf.org > Subject: [tsvwg] ECN experimentation draft - support adoption > Importance: High > > I support TSVWG adoption of this draft as its author (individual comment, not > in WG chair role), and I'd ask anyone else who is interested in seeing this > draft and the experiments that it enables progress to also please send a note > supporting adoption of this draft to the TSVWG list. > > Thanks in advance, --David > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: tsvwg [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black, David > > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 4:25 PM > > To: tsvwg@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [tsvwg] The TSVWG WG has placed draft-black-tsvwg-ecn- > > experimentation in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" > > > > Written as draft author, *not* WG chair, here are a few more details. > > > > > Following discussion at the IETF meeting in Seoul, this email starts a > > > formal adoption call for the above process draft. The draft, if adopted > > > will form the *BASIS* for a PS Update to RFC 3168, allowing the way for > > > experimentation using the ECT codepoint by publication of Experimental > > > RFCs. The document also proposes ending the previous IETF experiment > > > known as the "ECN Nonce". > > > > This draft also enables experimentation with different sender responses > > to ECN-detected congestion (CE-marked packets) by comparison to drops, > > and with use of ECN on TCP control packets and retransmitted packets. > > Drafts for these two areas of experimentation are being handled by > > the TCPM WG - in contrast, L4S is expected to be handled by the TSVWG > > WG. Also, the ECT codepoint intended for experimentation is ECT(1). > > > > I want to emphasize "*BASIS*" above. This is only an adoption call - the > text > > in this draft will almost certainly be modified before the WG is done with > this > > draft. > > > > Opposing adoption of this draft is effectively taking the position that one or > > more of the referenced experiments are very bad ideas that should not be > > pursued. > > > > Thanks, --David > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org] > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:27 PM > > > To: tsvwg@ietf.org; tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org; draft-black-tsvwg-ecn- > > > experimentation@ietf.org > > > Subject: The TSVWG WG has placed draft-black-tsvwg-ecn- > experimentation in > > > state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued" > > > > > > > > > The TSVWG WG has placed draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation in > state > > > Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Gorry Fairhurst) > > > > > > The document is available at > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-black-tsvwg-ecn- > experimentation/ > > > > > > > > > Comment: > > > Following discussion at the IETF meeting in Seoul, this email starts a > > > formal adoption call for the above process draft. The draft, if adopted > > > will form the *BASIS* for a PS Update to RFC 3168, allowing the way for > > > experimentation using the ECT codepoint by publication of Experimental > > > RFCs. The document also proposes ending the previous IETF experiment > > > known as the "ECN Nonce". > > > > > > Comments are welcome on the list to indicate if such a document is > > > considered useful for the IETF to publish, or expressing concerns about > > > any of these topics. You may also send comments on the current text > (and > > > these are welcome), but, if you do, please also clearly indicate if you > > > support the progress of work on this topic within TSVWG. > > > > > > All comments need to be received by 9th Dec 2016, after which a decision > > > will be made on how to progress. (You may read about the adoption > process > > > in RFC7221.)
- [tsvwg] ECN experimentation draft - support adopt… Black, David
- Re: [tsvwg] ECN experimentation draft - support a… Michael Welzl
- Re: [tsvwg] ECN experimentation draft - support a… John Leslie
- Re: [tsvwg] ECN experimentation draft - support a… Anna Brunstrom
- Re: [tsvwg] ECN experimentation draft - support a… Holland, Jake
- Re: [tsvwg] ECN experimentation draft - support a… Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [tsvwg] ECN experimentation draft - support a… De Schepper, Koen (Nokia - BE)