Re: [tsvwg] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-08: (with COMMENT)

[Michael Tuexen <[e-mail]>]

> On 20 Jan 2015, at 22:47, Black, David <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Benoit,
> 
>> The DTLS implementation MUST support DTLS 1.0 [RFC4347] and SHOULD
>>   support the most recently published version of DTLS, which is DTLS
>>   1.2 [RFC6347] as of December 2014.
>> 
>> December 2014 is wrong.
> 
> Nitpick department ;-) - as of Dec 2014, DTLS 1.2 [RFC6347] is the most
> recently published (as an RFC) version of DTLS, even though that RFC was
> published in Jan 2012, so the quoted text is actually correct ;-).
> 
> Nonetheless, here's a clearer suggestion:
> 
> OLD
>     support the most recently published version of DTLS, which is DTLS
>     1.2 [RFC6347] as of December 2014.
> NEW
>     support the most recently published version of DTLS, which was DTLS
>     1.2 [RFC6347] when this RFC was published (XXXXXXXXX 2015).
> 
>     RFC Editor: please fill in publication month of this RFC and ensure
>     that correctness of the above statement is checked during AUTH48.
> END
What about:

NEW
    support the most recently published version of DTLS, which was DTLS
    1.2 [RFC6347] when this RFC was published.
END

This provides the same information and is simpler. OK?

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tsvwg [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 4:34 PM
>> To: The IESG
>> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; draft-
>> [e-mail]
>> Subject: [tsvwg] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-
>> encaps-08: (with COMMENT)
>> 
>> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-08: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> The DTLS implementation MUST support DTLS 1.0 [RFC4347] and SHOULD
>>   support the most recently published version of DTLS, which is DTLS
>>   1.2 [RFC6347] as of December 2014.
>> 
>> December 2014 is wrong.
>> 
>